I mean, I know they've been using secret evidence for years, ever since the Omnibus Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 was passed in the House and Senate with vast bipartisan support, and signed by Bill Clinton. And it was even used hundreds of times to detain people who had no idea why before Bush came to office.
But come on, get real here. This is BUSH! And he had a drinking problem, and probably still does. So anything he does is as bad as what a drunken monkey would do.
And he's using this secret evidence against terrorists! Come on, it's not like they are members of drug cartels. It's ok to use secret evidence against them, as they have before. But TERRORISTS?! Come on, that's going too far.
2006-09-08 01:11:29 · 16 answers · asked by BrianthePigEatingInfidel 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Come on, where's my Amen chorus! Everyone else gets one.
2006-09-08 01:14:38 · update #1
yeah, where's my amen chorus? I know you're reading this.
2006-09-08 01:24:26 · update #2
It's all Bush's fault. We never had a president before him, so he's the only one who can be blamed. Just remember that. History doesn't exist. President Bush can actually be blamed for everything, all the way back to the crucifixion of Christ. I think, actually, he's been tied in with the Israelites being enslaved by the Egyptians way back during the times of Moses. It was also his fault that Eve ate the fruit. He was the serpent that tempted her.
I think he also talked Lucifer into rebelling against God. Yeah, that was Bush too. No wonder people hate him. EVERYTHING is his fault!
2006-09-08 02:11:00 · answer #1 · answered by The_Cricket: Thinking Pink! 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
King George? You can't oust a King without a revolution. George Bush will be gone after Jan 2009. Who are you going to blame things on then?
If you are worried about drinking problems, Ted Kennedy has more problems with drinking than George does.
2006-09-08 09:00:09 · answer #2 · answered by namsaev 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Remember the terrorist , are friends of the Democrats, so
when Bush goes after them, they take as a personal attack
On the other hand, how do the terrorist stand the Democrats
who main diet is at the pork barrel..
2006-09-08 08:45:45 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The so called "radical muslim" some idiot has pointed out is merely a concoction from the zionist media and MOSSAD allies and patsies posing as "Muslim" terrorists. Bush does nothing, he is a figurehead, a trained monkey reading speeches written by his pro-zionist brain trust. When the veils of illusion are finally lifted it will be a cataclysmic shock to the common man but no threat to the super-elite who control this world's "wealth".
Interesting fact: Every single U.S president that was and G.W Bush come from just two aristocratic families. Nepotism anyone?
Or something more sinister...
2006-09-08 08:41:14 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋
'going too far' you still have a lot to learn, terrorism is not a joke on the other side of the world, they brought the war to our soil, and our president, who is keeping you safe, is at least engaging them to keep them off our soil and to hold them accountable for the three thousand plus lives. What have you done to secure your freedom?
2006-09-08 08:47:01 · answer #5 · answered by shut up dummy 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Last time I looked America doesn't have kings. Grow up and join the real world.
2006-09-08 08:25:27 · answer #6 · answered by ANDREW L 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It's the law .
Why not terrorists ?
Obviously , you just dislike Bush because he's a republican .
I'd sooner a drunken monkey than a hatefull pussy .
2006-09-08 08:21:03 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Read the US Patriot Act, hope you feel that you aren't loosing any freedoms.
2006-09-08 08:29:37 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Even the head attorney for the marine's Say's this is wrong
2006-09-08 08:40:53 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
You're right. It's Bush so it must be evil.
2006-09-08 08:17:44 · answer #10 · answered by Iridium190 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋