2006-09-08
00:23:09
·
32 answers
·
asked by
V
2
in
Society & Culture
➔ Other - Society & Culture
I think astroboy may be gay, getting very defensive isn't he
2006-09-08
00:26:26 ·
update #1
Ok ok ok what I meant by normal is an arsehole has only one purpose, just as the doctor told the gay "man go home have 3 bowls of bran, 15 plums, 5 cups of prune juice and a vindaloo, this will show you what your **** is for".
2006-09-08
00:48:09 ·
update #2
And I thought gays were stupid aswell, they have have rumbled my homophibic tendencies, you clever lot!
2006-09-08
00:56:14 ·
update #3
Hey they get on my case with their sick constant inuendos on tv, not all of us want to hear it, oh and it's still a free country so I will say what I want or are hetrosexuals not allowed an opinion anymore?
2006-09-08
00:59:59 ·
update #4
No this is not normal.
Normal coming from the word 'norm' which will mean what the nature is made of and natural mating is between a male and a female.
This is nothing to do with beiing homophobic, this is just the fact of nature.
Gay have to use lubrifiant because indeed, the anal passage has other purpose than intercouse, unlike female where the vagina provides the lubrification naturally.
It is a bit too easy always to say 'it is normal' or 'we are in the 21th century' and when some people do not agree then to threat them d'homophobic because if we take it to the extreme then anything could be 'called' normal such as zoophily, pedofily etc....
So no, it is not normal and the norm should stay what the nature had decided.
Still, gay are humain beiing and regardless of the choosen lifestyle they have the qualities like any other to be good peoples and good friends.
2006-09-08 00:59:00
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I am not homophobic but lets just take a look at reality. the stuff that comes out of your body is waste and breeds many bacteria, germs, and diseases like hepatitis, just plain stuff that can make you sick. that's why we don't want to keep it around the house too long. when your sex life involves fecal matter on a regular basis, your gonna be sick, a lot. the fact that semen has anti body properties so that the females body doesn't reject it really messes up another males immune system when it enters rectal tears and trauma caused from the abuse it receives, I can think of no other word but abuse, but this causes the immune system to to be compromised snowballing the fact that there is fecal matter with all its germs just waiting to make them sicker. I am not making this up as you will notice they always seem to be a little sick, that's my personal observation anyhow. but anyhow, it seems to me that promoting this behavior and telling children that its acceptable is in reality quite irresponsible, and personally I am really tired of hearing about how great these people are when what they do to themselves is wrong on so many levels. a man who loves another man doesn't hurt them the way these people hurt each other and I can't support it ever.
you can find more about this at the cdc or look at factsaboutyouth.com
2013-12-17 14:06:08
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Normality is defined by your culture - culture is difficult to define, but I would say off the top of my head that it is shared values. So for you and the culture that you reside in - being gay may not be the norm, but for other cultures: ancient Greece, the blue oyster club, certain parts of SF it may be the norm --- normal.
If you define normality on the basis of biology there are plenty of examples of homosexual behaviour in nature - and if you base it on having babies, procreation - then the difficulty with that route is that sex without trying to have babies could then be viewed as not 'normal'. So you then have to resort to normality being based defined on culture rather than science. There are probably scientific arguments for both sides, but the examples given by others would (I feel) would probably be based on the culture of the person putting them forward.
Lastly I feel that you might make some 'gayboy' response based on your culture, but I'm hoping that others out there might find my argument useful.
2006-09-08 00:42:08
·
answer #3
·
answered by curious George 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
You could define normal one of two ways.
If normality is definied by the largest minority (or the majority), which would be heterosexuals (or dare I say bisexuals) then being gay is abnormal.
I prefer to look at society as a whole, however. It's normal for society to have many minorities, one of which is homosexuals. Therefore it's normal that a small proportion of people are gay.
The way I see it is that there's no such thing as a majority, only a larger minority. If there's a majority of minorities then the majority is the minority thus normality is abnormal.
2006-09-08 00:36:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by quierounvaquero 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
You may be surprised to note that the essence of true belief is not in perception, but in truth. Gays and lesbians are a product of society, and thus truly themselves believe they are normal. Normal compared to what and to who anyway? Are we comparing ourselves to each other? We have no right to do that, the only basis for comparison is against something infinitely more pure, and right. I beleive that is Jesus. With Him as a cornerstone, the truth is illuminated, and thus can humans find redemption in their activities, which produce such lustful deviations of their sexual nature.
2006-09-08 00:43:13
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Normal is a point of perspective ..from where you stand YOU are normal... but from where I stand I am normal ..
It is the same for everyone .. I guess the only distinction is that gay guys are probably in the minority .. but there is nothing wrong with that either ;)
2006-09-08 00:30:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by enzuigiriuk 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Normal neans subscribing to the norm. Since the majority of the world is heterosexual, that must be the norm, therefore, by that definition, homosexuals are abnormal.
Biologically, as every child learns, "The primary goal of every living organism is that it seeks to reproduce its species" - so, again, by that definition, homosexuals are abnormal.
what's left? By religious standards, they're abnormal.
It's only they who rabbit on about being normal. If they didn't, they'd have problems justifying their own existence wouldn't they.
The touble is that political correctness creeps in and anything goes in a desperate attempt to disguise reality. nobody these days is prepared to accept that a spade is called a spade.
2006-09-08 00:34:05
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Some might suggest you are not normal for being so damn ignorant.
Having said that, ignorance like yours does seem to be the rule rather than the exception at times.
2006-09-08 00:54:49
·
answer #8
·
answered by kezls_79 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
maybe, if you can accept that homosexuals, are how they are .
You can't change how they are, so why insult or categorise them?
Homosexuals are not that way, by choice, but by orientation
we are all different to each other in this world,
Some are tall, some short , some blond , some black , some yellow --------some pretty, some ugly.
YET we are all unique ..
we don't look on all other people , as being abnormal ,
even though, they may be different to us .
By classing homosexuals as "abnormal"
you are implying they are doing some wrong. or are harmful, in some way.
And this i think is unfair .
2006-09-08 00:43:51
·
answer #9
·
answered by sweet-cookie 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
My partner is the same. He can't understand it but to them, it is normal. It's not something they can help. I know someone who was married and has had kids and kept denying it because they thought everyone else was the same. it's one of those things that its best to accept.
2006-09-08 00:29:54
·
answer #10
·
answered by eamonandmegan 2
·
0⤊
0⤋