- However 'for ever and ever' it feels at the time!?
2006-09-08 00:01:56 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Family & Relationships ➔ Other - Family & Relationships
I think you're confusing love with the lustful and 'loved up' phase at the beginning of a relationship.
If you're with the right person, that feeling grows into a deep respectful love for eachother. You eventually manage to keep your hands off each other for longer periods of time!!!
Sounds wierd, but you start to love your partner in the way you do a sibling or parent as well as romantically, by that I mean that you accept their flaws and feel secure because the love is unconditional.
All I can advise is that you be completely honest and don't try to make the person into something they're not.
Lots of people become addicted to that first rush of feelings, but it never lasts beyond a few months, and what follows is nowhere near the 'buzz' but you recognise that it's much better in a subtle discreet kind of way.
2006-09-08 00:13:16 · answer #1 · answered by le_coupe 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
True love is for sure a permanent state! And what a wonder to be permanently near to heaven among the stars and your lover's voice to whisper in your ears: I will always love you!
2006-09-08 00:07:15 · answer #2 · answered by queen 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is a permanent state - it always is
Instead, the thing you describe as transient phrase is more like lust or infatuation
2006-09-08 00:04:40 · answer #3 · answered by unquenchablethirst 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
being in love is a transient state (although it can be re-invoked by the same couple).
Love is for ever and ever, even if you have to separate.
2006-09-08 00:05:58 · answer #4 · answered by AlphaOne_ 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
because everlasting love is rooted by technique of selflessness and short love is rooted in selfishness. the most elementary construction unit of a society is the family individuals unit. And if we are speaking about everlasting love because the right norm for our society, that's because everlasting love is the purely approach by technique of which the family individuals unit can live to inform the tale. If the family individuals fails, then society fails. extra alarmingly, society is failing because the family individuals unit is failing. The short lover provides beginning to issues which contain the spread of STD's, undesirable pregnancies ensuing in abortions ( an immoral maximum cancers upon our society in the present day ), unmarried figure homes, and individuals that count upon social welfare courses which inevitably can create lineages of authorities dependents who can not function productively in a society. very last i imagine maximum individuals misread what love is. maximum individuals imagine that love is an emotion. that's not. Love is a call, lust is the emotion. In that respect, the fast lover isn't a lover in any respect except to himself.
2016-11-06 21:37:18 · answer #5 · answered by derival 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am working on 14 years and still love him very much but the new wears off, but the friendship is always getting closer
2006-09-08 00:06:16 · answer #6 · answered by tory w 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think you can be in love permanently but the love itself changes as time goes on.
2006-09-08 00:04:15 · answer #7 · answered by horsegal 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
its a transient phase wait till ya marry him are married a few years and lust starts to fade...ppl mistake lust for love
although i agree in rare cases some ppl are lucky enough to find their mate for life
2006-09-08 00:10:37 · answer #8 · answered by tinkerbell 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Love can be a permanent state but there are many levels....
2006-09-08 01:51:42 · answer #9 · answered by devines 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the initial feeling is a phase. but I think that you could possibly love someone forever.... the spark may die a little though but something better replaces it apparently...
2006-09-08 00:04:23 · answer #10 · answered by rach 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋