English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-09-07 23:16:07 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports Cricket

8 answers

When competition is tough, such queries do prop up. If Sree Santh would have been included and Irfan/Munaf/Agarkar would have been omitted, the query would have been there for those bowlers.

You have to make a choice. Sree Santh or Munaf, Sree Santh or Balaji/Irfan/Zaheer Khan.

It is rather a good sign that even a deserving player like Sree Santh has to sit out. Do not worry buddy, he can be back at any time and moreover he is a young, budding and aggressive cricketer. You would see a lot of him in recent future.

2006-09-07 23:25:25 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

They Just compared Sree's one day statistics with R. P. Sing whose figures r little better then him overall as champions trophy is in India and they list include only 14 players they have to omit one of the fast bowlers so they have to makes this hard decision

2006-09-07 23:35:10 · answer #2 · answered by pallav g 1 · 0 0

They preferred R.P. Singh to Sri Santh as they found from the statisfics that R.P. Singh was more economical as compared to Sri Santh

2006-09-08 20:03:10 · answer #3 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 0 0

I'm also thinking that the selectors should have taken Ganguly,Kumble,Zaheer and Sreesanth rather than Mongia,Munaf,Powar and RP Singh.

2006-09-08 02:10:52 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

He is a good bowler, but not good enpugh. Must prove himself more & show his best, which is yet to come.

2006-09-08 04:14:08 · answer #5 · answered by (^_^) 5 · 0 0

He is out by a very very thin margin.He can be in any moment.

2006-09-08 00:18:43 · answer #6 · answered by rjbendre 3 · 0 0

THEY WANT TO HIGH LIGHT IRFAN AS THE LEADING INDIAN QUICKIE LIKELY.

AS TEAM INDIA'S CONCERN, ITS TOO MYSTERIOUS THAT WORDS LIKE INJURY, OMISSION, INCLUSSION,RECALL etc.

NOBODY EMPOWERED TO RAISE A QUESTION ABOUT THOSE..

2006-09-08 01:01:38 · answer #7 · answered by A.R.RAJA 6 · 0 2

because of less performance

2006-09-09 18:57:17 · answer #8 · answered by hrithik 2 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers