English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Theres no difference between them right?

2006-09-07 22:55:13 · 7 answers · asked by abc 2 in Politics & Government Politics

7 answers

It scares me that two people who have made this country a laughing stock in regards to foreign policy are the only two who are deemed fit by the powers that be to run the country. There is one other runner who claims he is running a "Tony Benn" campaign (basing it on the labour party members not the mp's) and his chances well they have got to be slim.Brown already has his feet under the table so to speak.So yes they are tweedle dee and tweedle dum or should that be dumb and dumber.....

2006-09-07 23:03:35 · answer #1 · answered by lost my mojo 2 · 0 0

Got it straight! Right out of Lewis Carroll. But is this a surprise? Polotics is pretty much a Crackerjacks box with a silly toy as the prize. Sorry to mix metaphors.

2006-09-08 06:04:02 · answer #2 · answered by expatturk 4 · 0 0

They are two different people in one
party. Does not mean they have same
character.
Blair is now sale by date.

2006-09-08 06:13:58 · answer #3 · answered by nomad 4 · 0 0

I was thinking along the lines of those two old crows in cartoons...heckle and jeckle

2006-09-08 06:02:12 · answer #4 · answered by Cherry_Blossom 5 · 0 0

Yes mate!..You've hit the nail right on the f***in end there!

2006-09-08 06:25:26 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I agree, they are both as bad as each other

2006-09-08 05:57:26 · answer #6 · answered by wordykat 5 · 0 0

no.

2006-09-08 06:04:43 · answer #7 · answered by thebigtombs 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers