A developing economy should maintain a low profile on enviormental issue. agree or disagree ?

Answer 1

NO... i dont disagree
if u keep low profile then the other country companies would not be intrested in Business trade and others purpose.
the countryl should be active and reach all parts of the world.
to become a developed country, the country should maintain high profile only in good activites
not like bad activities as Afgan, taliban and pakistan
these countries encourage terrorism and they have negative profile

Answer 2

Disagree - A Developing Country may be using a Number of Resources which are having a considerable effect on Local as well as Regional Environment . This may be due to the use of more Thermal Power Plants,Vehicular Emission etc. In fact developing countries may ; in some respects be better suited to adopt Environmentally Efficient ways than a Developed Country . So maintaining a Low Profile is not very beneficial . But yes , it should not succumb to International pressure on each issue .

Answer 3

Terribly disagree. All countries have an equal say in environmental issues (let's put aside the economic leverage factor aside). To maintain a low profile would signal disterest, or fear of the 'developed' economies. Not a good way to start off in the world.

Answer 4

Disagree. Advancement one one hand in economic terms and regression on the other environmental hand is a direct contradiction to what the term 'economy' implies. Developing countries (I live in one) are in a prime position to take advantage of developed nations industrial advancements, while at the same time preserving the environment, which in turn will benefit the global economy.

Answer 5

Need more information. The question is too general. In relation to what? The economy is a very important factor in any developing Nation. The environment is also a very important issue and not necessarily a renewable one so it also takes a front seat. If people are poor and starving though, its not important to the situation until the economy is stable.

Answer 6

never. the common thought is that environmental subject concerns are economically costly, besides the fact that no longer all are. there's a controversy to be made that small farmers getting in touch with the subject concerns ought to open up markets in lots an identical way because of the fact the "straightforward commerce" and "organic and organic" markets have flourished. arising international locations that have an commercial base might additionally notice themselves to the manufacturing of capability saving units for the two their living house and export markets. Given their low labour expenses they may well be very aggressive, this in turn might develop employment and raise standards of living. Too many times environmental subject concerns are seen to be adverse and extreme priced yet that may no longer inevitably the case.

Answer 7

Agree 100%

Answer 8

Agree, but the rate of growth of economy should be proportional to the environmental issues. The greater the economy achieved, greater the environment be protected.

Answer 9

A small developing economy shouldn't be held back by over stringent environmental laws. It puts them at an automatic economic disadvantage.
However a large developing economy like China or India could do great damage to themselves and the world if they don't adhere to good environmental practice.

Answer 10

Completely disagree. Eliminate inefficiency as soon as possible. For your proposal following analogy seem fitting: Buying 100 computer from kid on the street to keep all your business records.