Hmm...i would really like to know.
2006-09-07 20:31:01 · 21 answers · asked by babyboix87 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Most likely Condi Rice. The reason is that there are two main planks of the Democratic Party: Women and African-Americans.
Hillary and Condi would likely split the difference with women (so they'd cancel each other out); but Condi being the first African-American candidate for president (from a major party) would energize the entire African-American community; and I have little doubt that they would heavily come out in her favor. By depriving the Democratic Party of one of its most important planks, and neutralizing the other, I think Condi would seriously kick Hillary's butt.
Plus, you have to consider how deeply and seriously Hillary is disliked by millions of Republicans. So she would face a rock-solid Republican base of opposition, and a corroded Democratic base of support. I just don't see how she could win against that.
Super question.
2006-09-07 20:39:15 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
I think Condoleezza Rice
2006-09-08 01:46:14 · answer #2 · answered by Anry 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am a Democrat and like both of them. I like Rice more, she is very smart. If Bush would have read Dr. Rice's report in August 2001, he might have prevented the Sep 11 attacks.
I would like to see them run together instead of as opponents. Rice for Pres and Hilary for vice president.
2006-09-07 23:53:52 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither. i does not vote for the two of them. Clinton has a violent streak and so-so perspectives at the same time as wealthy does no longer something yet make up excuses. as properly, it does not fairly count huge sort who we vote for because of the fact the two way, the U.S. cabinet makes a decision who will grow to be the subsequent president in the long-term. they simply "take votes into attention in the previous making the selection for their component of their state." Oh, yeah, and greater then basically 2 and 3 events run for president.
2016-10-14 11:00:06 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it would probably result in a record voter turnout. so the increase in voters would skew any current predictions. I think it would be close, but I Rice would get all the black vote and much of the minority vote (who would love to see her in office), steal lots of Hillarys women voters (deplete Hillarys main strength and she's in trouble), and get 85% of the conservative and right wing voters (who are deathly afraid of Clinton). To me that adds up to about 62 to 38% for Rice after all the votes are counted. But all just speculation because I believe Rice when she says she's not gonna run for President.
2006-09-07 20:49:49 · answer #5 · answered by nightcricket 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Dr. Rice.
The country needs a Republican President.
2006-09-07 20:40:39 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
I really don't know!
I would hope it would be Condalisa Rice.?
I believe she is a very smart woman and does not have to resort to yelling and screaming to make a point. I believe if she makes a promise , she will try to keep it and not sluff it off as a campaign promise, not to be fulfilled.
Another 4-8yrs of the Clintons, please HELP!
2006-09-07 20:40:30 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Rice by a landslide.
Minority vote will leave the Democratic party instantly.
&
Hillary is so hated by the Republicans that more voters would turn out to vote against her than last elections Republican turnout.
2006-09-07 20:33:45 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 1⤋
Condi! Anybody but Hilary
2006-09-07 20:38:50 · answer #9 · answered by Paul L 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I believe Rice would win.
2006-09-07 20:37:57 · answer #10 · answered by Judas Rabbi 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋