Would you pay to see it again?
If not, guess she's got no future as a porn star!
2006-09-07 19:23:58
·
answer #1
·
answered by me 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Not every woman who shows her boobs is a porn star. Kate Winslet is a good actress not a porn star. Even though Titanic was really really awful.
2006-09-08 02:23:35
·
answer #2
·
answered by patches0528 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
DOH! Kate Winslet an actress not a porn star
2006-09-08 10:49:43
·
answer #3
·
answered by jo k 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
No, she was posing for a sketch artist. I guess if it were to have been a porn, they got the first three letters right though TIT...anic.
2006-09-08 02:31:50
·
answer #4
·
answered by chris' angel 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
Rose was posing for a sketch, not banging Jack. Nudity and sexuality are not the same thing. And did you actually see them, or did you see Jack's sketch OF them?
2006-09-08 02:29:02
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yeah and after the nipps she hasnt done anything worth anything again..Leonardo made that movie ..all the girls went to see it 4 times....actresses who want to make it need to stay covered but they all dum..accept a few....
2006-09-08 02:39:40
·
answer #6
·
answered by dreamy 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
She is definetly a porn star.Only those kinda people take off their clothes.
2006-09-08 05:32:46
·
answer #7
·
answered by singler 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Probably, but a classy one. Why are you still thinking about this?
2006-09-08 02:27:26
·
answer #8
·
answered by jit bag 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Gawd, I so wish your Mommy would just unplug the darn computer already!
2006-09-08 17:58:54
·
answer #9
·
answered by Island Queen 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
ummm no.. it was done in a very tasteful way. get your mind out of the gutter.
2006-09-08 02:23:47
·
answer #10
·
answered by owensb01 3
·
2⤊
0⤋