Brilliant peace activist or old hag who probably makes her hero son turn over in his grave?
2006-09-07 19:15:13 · 16 answers · asked by Cinner 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Pathetic self-promoter who stomps on the memory of her son to promote her own self-agrandizing agenda. Her adult son made his own decision to re-enlist to do what he thought was right and honorable. Her actions have destroyed his memory, and she didn't even have the time to get him a grave stone. She does more to harm the anti-war movement than help it. She misrepresents the sentiment of others who have lost loved ones with utter disrespect for their feelings.
Note to "eternity": Bush's daughter's are adults. He can't volunteer them for anything. So quit using that pathetic Moorish cliche and show some form of originality, if your capable. And given that a higher percentage of presidents have been assasinated or shot than soldiers that have died in war, I'd say Bush is laying it on the line as much as any soldier. And he did volunteer for that job, even after Hussein attempted to have his dad assassinated.
2006-09-07 19:27:33 · answer #1 · answered by freebird 6 · 3⤊ 5⤋
While I can understand her grief, I think she's going overboard. I'm neither Pro-Republican or Pro-Democrat. I will say though that being President is a job I wouldn't want.
While I don't always agree with Bush's decisions, I know that it's not easy being in that type of leadership role because when you screw up, you're the public figurehead people can point the finger on and blame.
I'm sure there are were may have been some political agendas and what not floating around regarding oil and what not, but that still doesn't take away from the fact that when you're Commander in Chief, you still have to make some tough decisions.
2006-09-08 02:19:21 · answer #2 · answered by Link of Hyrule 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Why don't you all lay off her? She lost a child, for God's sake. A child who was recruited out of high school. Do you realize that under No Child Left Behind, schools must give the names, addresses, social security numbers, and phone numbers to the military on request? And they say it's an all volunteer army... sure it is, after the kids are lied to repeatedly, and bribed with an Xbox. Cindy Sheehan wants this kind of thing to stop, and I don't blame her. Imagine losing your child for a lie. It's like someone coming into your home, pretending to be your friend, and then murdering your kids. Recruiters prey on kids because they know how impressionable they are, and how naive and out of touch politically most of them are.
Parents - if you are against having your child lied to, bribed, and massacred, seek out your options to stop this on www.themmob.org
2006-09-08 04:12:59 · answer #3 · answered by ReeRee 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Now you could easily have worded the second half of that question differently, but it seems you want to let us know how you feel about her. No objectivity here!
I'll go with brilliant peace activist. Anyone who says she is enjoying her son's death, whether Democrat or Republican, is a complete waste of human space. Scum. Misguided, intellectually lazy, vicious scum.
2006-09-08 02:49:00 · answer #4 · answered by tiko 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
she has a right, that is what her son fought for. so she has a short memory too. he volunteered, she didn't. she can be bitter but at the same time be a TOOL of the Dems that fund her grandstanding over her son's death. we should see her for what she is and make our own judgements. if you let her make up your mind then YOU'RE A TOOL too. to be used by those that want our nation to be weak against terrorism.
count on your fingers the genuine good ideas she has come up with to fight terrorism.... Bush has let our borders go and the Dems have no answers either.
2006-09-08 02:28:01 · answer #5 · answered by johnjohnwuzhere 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Her name alone is polarizing. She should be sad and properly have grieved but its time to stop dishonering her son. Her son joined the military to fight for his country(at least he must have ), and then reenlisted. She does not understand fully what the war on terror involves and places her anger in the wrong place. I can see why she blames Bush but he met with her the first time and nothing was said, suddenly the second time shes a changed(more bitter) woman. Could it be she is influenced by radical groups that hate Bush and she is a stepping stone being used by them to further their anti American agenda. I think its obvious.
2006-09-08 02:28:43 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
We can't blame her for doing that. It was very painful to lose kids on the war that we shouldn't be there the first place. If we didn't stick our nose into somebody else's business, we wouldn't be ended up this mass we're having now. This is all about the OIL. The Oil families in White House are afraid to lose the profits which makes them richer and richer...we, are the little papa are paying the prices by sending our kids to die...
2006-09-08 02:29:59 · answer #7 · answered by Mimi 4 · 4⤊ 3⤋
If some people believe that she is exploiting her son's death,then what about AMERICA'S MOST WANTED by John WALSH. He has exploited the death of his son Adam. Yes he has helped others,but so has Cindy Sheehan. George Walker Bush is a hypocrite and a CHICKEN HAWK. Why does he not volunteer her daughters to a war that he believes in. He did NOT volunteer for VietNam. CLUCK,CLUCK,CLUCK. KIKIRIKEE!!!
2006-09-08 02:23:49 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 5⤋
No doubt about it, she is an idiot. I think at first she was doing her protests out of grief of losing her son. However, I think that she has become a tool of the democrats and has become a total disgrace to the memory of her son.
2006-09-08 02:43:13 · answer #9 · answered by nite_raideress 4 · 3⤊ 3⤋
id10t (idiot), she should have been involved when he was alive , people dint go into the military with the expectation of seeing the world , and her son knew that , he volunteered , He knew what he wanted and she is running all over the country because he is haunting her a$$
2006-09-08 02:26:15 · answer #10 · answered by Kitten,Doc 6 · 4⤊ 3⤋