How come in the scenes where the hero goes in to take on the rival school all the students rushing at once are so much easier than just the master by himself? Or, do you think in reality it wouldn't go that way?
2006-09-07 19:08:38 · 12 answers · asked by martin h 6 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
I can appreciate all the answers listed here, but there are two things most people don't articulate:
Firstly, your question is based in movies, which are meant to entertain. It wouldn't do much good to have the hero have a final showdown with the evil proprietor of the school if he gets beat up on his way there!
Secondly, and perhaps more important, only about three people can attack a single person simultaneously at any given time. This is due just to how much mass a person takes up! Even if a person is facing 30 people, they aren't all going to be able to attack at once. Besides, when facing multiple opponents, there is more of a sense of urgency to dispose of them at a rapid rate, thus using the least amount of moves possible to inflict the greatest damage, such as shots to the groin or throat, etc.
These factors, as well as others (such as the master teaching all the students all they know!), being the case, I would say it would be more difficult to take on just the master. In reality, though, that really doesn't happen all too often!
2006-09-09 05:13:57 · answer #1 · answered by Steel 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The master. He knows more tricks than all of his students combined... and in martial arts, the secret "killer" moves are not taught except to the one considered to be the "heir". It is true... there is always a move or two further that are not taught as they are extremely lethal. Only the select ones are taught of these since they are supposed to perpetuate the school of thought itself.
2006-09-08 02:13:29 · answer #2 · answered by Bummerang 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Chuck Norris demonstrates this in many of his movies. He goes into Chinatown and takes on about 35 to 40 blackbelts.
2006-09-08 02:12:41 · answer #3 · answered by Joe K 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well I think it could be about even depending on how skilled the students were compared to you. You could either be outnumbered strength in numbers and outmatched against the students or outmatched against the master.
2006-09-08 02:30:11 · answer #4 · answered by n8boi02 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No way would 30-40 ppl be easier then one, unless the one was Superman or Neo or something.
2006-09-08 02:15:47 · answer #5 · answered by mury902 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
students
who said the student is worse than master. in old saying student can beat the masters. i dont know how to say it in english well.
2006-09-08 02:14:37 · answer #6 · answered by niceQ 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Never bet against Chuck Norris,..ever.
lol
2006-09-08 02:22:23 · answer #7 · answered by allyrbaserbelong2us 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Definetly the students, I mean.... 1 on1 , at least you have some chance of defending yourself.
2006-09-08 02:14:19 · answer #8 · answered by baller39393 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the students
2006-09-08 02:11:17 · answer #9 · answered by psxfff123 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, that would so not happen. We had at least 15 black belts alone...
2006-09-08 02:11:21 · answer #10 · answered by sndprssr 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋