English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

14 answers

Guilty as sin. Genius as hell, but going absolutely mad! It's a damn shame to see someone so incredibly talented, turn into a raving lunatic.

Personally, and this is pure speculation, I think he suffered some sexual, physical, and mental abuse at the hands of his father, and even his mother. He was brought up in a fanatical cult, and who knows went on with all of that. It's no wonder that he's turned out the way he is. It's sad that hed didn't get treatment early on before he really fell off the deep end.

Such a waste. And then there's the children, it's horrible.

2006-09-07 18:08:19 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Guilty

2006-09-08 01:04:06 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Guilty as hell. The reason he got acquited was because the people who sued him werent squeaky clean so the jury heard a lot of dirt about them and they couldn't convict. I don't see how his act of poor sick pitiful me made them feel sorry for him. he made me puke and his fans had to be to be the weirdest.
I hope his ex wife takes him for a real ride .I bet he gets plenty of kids in his new place.

2006-09-08 01:15:03 · answer #3 · answered by saltydog 2 · 2 0

I thought he was guilty before the trial, and before he ran away to another country so he could keep molesting children.
Debbie Rowe - you should be shot for breeding future victims for him.

2006-09-08 01:03:45 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

When one boy says he did it maybe. But several kids say it hes guilty.

2006-09-08 01:20:35 · answer #5 · answered by Harry W 4 · 1 0

You'll get different answers depending who you ask. Liberals tend to avoid connecting the dots -- even when the dots are connected right before their eyes. It's obvious jacko did it but just bought himself out.

2006-09-08 01:07:47 · answer #6 · answered by mdigitale 7 · 2 2

guilty, he's a weirdo. And sick in the head, needs treatment.

2006-09-08 01:03:48 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

without a doubt GUILTY

2006-09-08 01:07:19 · answer #8 · answered by ♥ Lips of Morphine ♥ 4 · 2 1

not guilty. the person that was suing had suid walmart and target before. she was just trying to make money

2006-09-08 01:03:22 · answer #9 · answered by Kasra 2 · 0 2

hes a sick freak i really think that he did it i know someone that sued him and got millions (and no its not the guy that recently sued him)

2006-09-08 01:03:22 · answer #10 · answered by janny1214832000 3 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers