ever make up their minds?
2006-09-07 17:30:03 · 16 answers · asked by Ned B 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
If the polls said most Californians were Devil worshipers, on her next trip to Cali, she would say: I am a life long Devil worshiper, I really am!
Most pols, play politics and listen to polls. But Hillary takes the friggin cake. She is now of course trying to come across as a moderate. The leftists who now run the Dem party hate her Iraq position. Now she is coming across as both pro war and anti war at the same time.
Hillary can pull off being anti gay marriage though. She is trying to appear to be a moderate and wants to garnish church votes and minority votes, they oppose gay marriage. She can campaign this way, why at the same time winking at her lesbo and gay friends. They will understand.
The war stuff is her problem, there are enough leftists who hate her, even though Hillary is an avowed Socialist. Do not be surprised if she does not run for president, she has too many skeletons, believe me.
2006-09-07 17:44:35 · answer #1 · answered by TG Special 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The democratic pary has fallen apart! I do not even know what the heck they stand for! Most of the time they just go along with the Republicans! They seemed just scared and powerless. None of their candidates for president are strong. Hillary being one of the worst ones. If the democratic pary had any sense and wanted any chance of winning then she is the last person they should consider for a president.
2006-09-07 18:17:45 · answer #2 · answered by rose 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, you're wrong.
March 2, 2004--Sen. Hillary Clinton has also clearly stated she believes marriage should remain between a man and woman, exclusively. http://www.family.org/cforum/fosi/marriage/nac/a0031029.cfm
2003--"Marriage has got historic, religious and moral content that goes back to the beginning of time, and I think a marriage is as a marriage always has been, between a man and a woman." - Hillary Clinton, opposing same-sex marriages, quoted in The New York Daily News
She did, however, say that gays deserve domestic partner benefits.
2006-09-07 17:42:11 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You do realize that Ronald Reagan was a Democrat and a union president, then, because there was a Democratic candidate, he switched to Republican and suddenly had the urge to break unions, among other things. The current Secretary of Agriculture was a Democrat, but, oh, there was already a Democrat running for mayor in Lincoln, Nebraska, so he switched to Republican, and lo and behold stood for a completely different set of issues. Can't those darn Republicans make up their minds. George just admitted that we had secret prisons where we tortured prisoners. I wonder if they had the balls to call them Auschwitz.
or Gulag 17 or Ofuna. Here's a tidbit
There, prisoners thought to hold critical intelligence were placed under a strict regimen designed to make them break. Solitary confinement, blindfolding and compulsory calisthenics were routine. Prisoners were shaved and stripped, forbidden from speaking to each other and made to stand at attention or assume uncomfortable positions for interrogations. Cooperate, and treatment might improve. Violate the rules and you might be slapped or beaten -- or worse.
This happened to a US soldier at a Japanese camp and we were appalled, outraged, disgusted, angry, and demanding of justice. Now, we do it..........how sad.
2006-09-07 17:42:04 · answer #4 · answered by Ice 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm a democrat, but I am NOT a fan of Hillary Clinton! I believe she would be a danger to this country if she were ever elected president. She is wishy washy on all topics, and she is responsible for our current health care crisis. I only hope that the DNC does not pick her as the democratic candidate as that would mean that I would be forced to vote republican.
2006-09-07 17:45:30 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Democrats and Republicans increasingly see the world in different ways. I know many Republicans who are so devoted to church but they couldn't prove their competance at skills or work tasks if their life depended on it. I know many Democrats who are very well educated and competent at work yet can't even make a moral argument because they don't see any morals one way or another.
We are becoming like two unealthy siblings who are so interested in being unique and different we starting to forget what it means to be an integrated human being with complex feelings about something. Everything is going to one side or another.
We shouldn't be so polarized and we shouldn't make villains out of the other political group. We need to find the reasonable people on each side and reach out and build bridges to individuals, instead of stereotyping each other.
2006-09-07 17:37:24 · answer #6 · answered by goof 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Nope, cant say that I am, I reside in Vermont where civil union laws are incorporated. The increase of gay married couples has increased quite a bit in my area. I know a few couples,male and female, but there is still controversy when it comes to legal financial issues. They have been refused loans for a home due to their lifestyle. So even though the state recognizes the marriage the financial institutes tends to look at it as 2 separate people. A shame actually.
2016-03-27 02:19:52 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Holding your finger in the air to gauge the wind is not leadership. it is meteorology. That's a "weather guesser" for all you products of the liberal education system. You know who you are. You are the ones who have a diploma and can't read it, but know who invented the Internet.
2006-09-07 17:47:08 · answer #8 · answered by gimpalomg 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
poll numbers, ha, she thought those were lottery numbers and she lost, just like the rest of the dummycrats!
2006-09-08 00:11:08 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
They have no standard, so they go whichever way the wind is blowing. They can't stand either. They have no backbone.
2006-09-07 17:33:48 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋