demanding ABC dump the 9/11 documentary if they are not going to edit out the parts that make him look bad? I imagine that would include his speech in which he boasts about being "that close to nabbing Bin Laden'" and probably the part about his man Sandy Burger "making an honest mistake" (LOL) by stuffing Top Secret documents down his pants.
2006-09-07 17:07:16 · 22 answers · asked by Cinner 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
I believe Clinton is a traitor and a criminal. Sandy Berger, oh yeah, he accidently stuffed top secret info in his shorts. Can you imagine if a Repub got caught doing that? It would be on the front page of the NY Times every day for a year.
Let us not forget Al Gore collecting illegal monies from the Chinese at the Buddhist temple. Then what a strange coincidence, shortly thereafter China received all kinds of technological and military secrets, hmmm?
Clinton and his wacko sidekick, Gore, and Sandy Berger should be in Guantanamo right now!
2006-09-07 17:13:36 · answer #1 · answered by TG Special 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋
President Regan demanded that anyone that came into the oval office wear at least a spot coat dress jacket,as a show of respect for the office.Bill got a BJ from an ugly fat broad on the desk. Where did Bill show respect for the office? How about when he lost the "nuke football" code and didn't tell anyone.The nuclear football,is the brief case that follows the president everywhere.The president is given the code to open the brief case to launch nuclear weapons.The code is changed every so often by the def dept.When the Def dept asked President Clinton for the old code he said "well I lost it about a month ago...". He had Bin Laden on a stick.I used to like him as a President but I slowly realized that he will be right up there w/ Buchanan historically.
2006-09-08 00:29:12 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
The same way Bush whined about Fahrenheit 911 but if you tried to edit out the parts that made Bush look bad there would not have been a movie. He make himself look bad everyday and haven't we heard Bush boast about almost nabbing Bin Laden in Tora Bora??? With all the secret wire tapping and secret prisons and all the closed door testimony Bush and Cheney had done especially to Valerie Plame are you trying to compare that to what Sandy Burger did give it a break. I think Clinton did a good job as a President.
2006-09-08 00:16:20 · answer #3 · answered by meanblacktiger 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Unfortunately I don't think this is an unusual practice for any politician. I love investigative journalism when done correctly and with true justice in mind... in contrast politics is mostly about reputation and looking good in the media. If people put as much effort into holding politicians accountable as they do into keeping up to date on the latest Hollywood gossip there may not be a need for these type of actions.
2006-09-08 00:17:41 · answer #4 · answered by ecogeek4ever 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
He let Saddam massacre 300,000 Revolutionary Iraqis that fights for their freedom and democratic principles. And he did not even blink or raise a finger to do anything about them.
He didn't support the words and prestige of another President in his term, Internationally. He brought the Political War outside the United States of America, which is bad for the image of the Presidency.
2006-09-08 00:21:03 · answer #5 · answered by wacky_racer 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The maker of the movie is Rush Limbaugh friend. Clinton authorized
any attempt to get Bin Laden. If Clinton let Bin Laden go why did Bush not go after him as soon as he was appointed in 2000,and why did Bush not hold one anti-terrorist meeting before 911 with his head of terrorist Richard Clark. Clark had to track Bush down and warn him that Bin Laden was going to use airplanes. Lets not forget that 911 happened under Bush`s watch and he is on tape stating that he don`t spend that much time on Bin Laden.
2006-09-08 00:17:09 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
I just posted a question about the pressure to censor the movie, too. Seems really hypocritical for the democrats to pull this!
Maybe if Clinton had kept his pants zipped things might have been different.
How about all those people who voted for him KNOWING that he was doing all these things while in office....like it's no distraction at all.
2006-09-08 00:14:09 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think Bill's ego is way too large and his arrogance is apparent with his attempts to stifle free expression. Liberals are all for free speech until it makes them look bad (which the facts often do) and suddenly, censorship seems to suit them just fine.
Billy would have been a great used car salesman. Hence, the nickname "Slick Willy" (a.k.a. B.S. Artist Extraordinaire)
Nice double-standard. Par for the course (for Libs).
2006-09-08 00:37:03 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
You missed the point. There are scenes in the movie that Sandy Berger, Madeleine Allbright, and others, wrote a letter to the movie makers about. These scenes contained utter falsehoods.
Clinton himself has, so far , made no comment.
2006-09-08 00:12:22 · answer #9 · answered by Thom Thumb 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I'm surprised this isn't on FOX.. it's so biased.. what kind of a president sits with the kids he's with for another 10 minutes after learning our country has been ATTACKED??!!
You think Clinton wants it off the air only because it makes him look bad? He wants it off because it's a bunch of conservatist brainwashing CRAP! Yeah, Bush handled it PERfectly! Morons. Idiots.
Yeah.. 9/11 was all CLINTON'S fault.. Bush never ignored any warnings? What warnings?
AHAHAhaha!
I'm wasting my time on this.
2006-09-08 02:14:15 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋