2006-09-07 17:03:22 · 16 answers · asked by D 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
hahaha.. they'll try to blame it on someone...
I think Americans are getting tired of it... another attack would crush the party...
2006-09-07 17:08:51 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
But let us never forget the first attack on WTC happened during Clinton's time,I some how feel that those towers were marked for destruction.Give Blind Sheik and others the Truth Serum and they will tell the truth It cannot be Clinton or Bush This seems to be the work of the parties that were to gain the most out of this mess.
2006-09-08 00:12:50 · answer #2 · answered by Dr.O 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They will always blame Clinton. As long as there is breath in the Republican party, they will blame Clinton.
And they accuse liberals of using scapegoats.
2006-09-08 00:10:18 · answer #3 · answered by volleyballchick (cowards block) 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No.
However, he and his youthful administration can take most of the credit for events leading to 9-11. What did he do about WTC 1993 and the USS Cole by the way?
2006-09-08 00:57:24 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why would anything change?...The Republicans like to blame everyone else but themselves for the stupid mistakes made by them, since they took control of the Government.
2006-09-08 04:03:55 · answer #5 · answered by MSJP 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why not? That bastard is to blame for OBL's still being around to terrorize the world, not to mention giving away technical secrets to our enemies, and all the other crap he pulled while he was in the White House.
2006-09-08 00:20:22 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No we will blame John and Ted and maybe Gore, that is if he is not busy reinventing the internet or solving the global warming problem!
2006-09-08 00:07:31 · answer #7 · answered by sundevilcajun 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
sure. they never take ownership...even when they are the ones controlling congress and the presidency...somehow they manage to blame someone else...or lie about it...or manipulate the situation....or set someone up....just like they did Bill..he was set up and exposed doing something that other presidents did and got away with. shame of it being...people laugh about it... and forget about how much better off our country was back then.
2006-09-08 00:10:57 · answer #8 · answered by games 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
probably. but ya know, none of those rep ever seem to mention that during clintons terms, there were no attacks on US soil. Hmmm, wonder if there might be a connection there?
2006-09-08 00:09:24 · answer #9 · answered by mxzptlk 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Won't have to. There's plenty of Dems selling out the country for polical reasons..
2006-09-08 00:06:55 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋