2006-09-07 16:55:50 · 3 answers · asked by zacharychiaro 2 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Biology
If other people cannot run the same experiment to confirm the conclusion(s) of the experiment then it would be questionable if the conclusions are correct.
2006-09-07 17:03:00 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
verifiable experiments have control elements that are consistent. Reliability, or stability, of an assessment procedure involves the measuring device being consistent. Repeated measurements should produce similar results. Therefore, experiments that are verifiable are more reliable and produce consistent results.
2006-09-08 00:05:11 · answer #2 · answered by ? 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Without them, the 'scientific method' would cease to exist. It demands that anyone anywhere will verify the original result or that result is bogus and needs to be replaced with another theory to explain whatever phenomena is being looked at.
2006-09-08 00:28:39 · answer #3 · answered by Steve 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋