I agree. Michael Moron made a movie with lies, distortions and half-truths. If I remember it came out in June of 2004.... just a few months before the election that Kerry tried to steal. So I don't want to hear chit from the mentally ill liberals that this movie is somehow illegal because of the upcoming election. I also don't want to hear about how it should be censored, because they were all crying "Freedom of Speech" for Michael Moron's movie. Where's the freedom of speech now beooootches!?
2006-09-08 03:18:57
·
answer #1
·
answered by Cambion Chadeauwaulker 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
Go to http://pol.moveon.org/abcdoc/ to sign MoveOn's petition to stop the movie.
An excerpt from: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14733545/
<< OLBERMANN: You were privy to everything the president read each day, you had daily access to him. Is there any truth to the principal insinuation here that he was distracted from terrorism by the Lewinsky affair?
SEAN MALONEY: Absolutely not. Let me tell you what. I was there. I saw the president every day during the entire Lewinsky episode, from the day it started to the day it ended. And it was my job to provide him with his daily workload, a mountain of stuff that goes through the Oval Office. And I can tell you, that guy was focused like a laser beam on doing his job. And you know what else I did, I saw all the national security information that went to the president every day, including all the information on the growing threat of al Qaeda. And I can tell you, this — President Clinton was focused like a laser beam on it. And I‘m just telling you as a guy who was there. It is a smear to say that he wasn‘t. It‘s a subjective view, there is no evidence to support it. And I can tell you, as a guy who was in the room, it‘s just not the case. And you know who else knew it? The American people. And that‘s why they stood by him, because he was doing his job. And that‘s why he enjoys the favorable ratings he has today.
OLBERMANN: Do you fear that people will actually believe the docudrama, and now put more blame on President Clinton than he deserves for the events that led up to 9/11?
MALONEY: Well, look, why would ABC be so careless with the truth? Let‘s be clear, there is no dispute that there are factual mistakes in this movie, and they are serious. They just say things that didn‘t happen. And ABC doesn‘t dispute that. Now, the president of ABC Entertainment has said it‘s critically important to get it right. So why not get it right? Why not clean this thing up, or take it down until you get it right? You know, I‘m a New Yorker, and those of us in New York are getting to celebrate the five-year anniversary of this terrible episode. And you know what we‘re thinking about? We‘re still getting on handle on what was in the toxic cloud that went out. The families are still grieving with their loss. This should be a nonpartisan day to come together. This is a terrible time, using falsehoods, to inject politics into this commemoration. I just don‘t know why ABC would do it. It‘s wrong. They ought to fix it. >>
2006-09-08 15:38:49
·
answer #2
·
answered by Emerald Blue 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Notice all the discussion and news about this "entertainment event"?
Have you considered these politcal accusations may be a very clever approach by ABC to get lots and lots of free advertising for the show. So they can edit to to blandness now, and still get great ratings.
2006-09-08 16:38:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by Rjmail 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I agree........if the Bush administration and republicans did what these guys re doing.....press would be all over it, screaming about freedom of speech and artistic freedom...no outrage from any of the press...shows you how they are nothing but a left-winged, cheering section for the Democrats
2006-09-08 16:56:21
·
answer #4
·
answered by abc 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Wow, imagine the furor when somebody makes a movie about Clinton's impeachment!
2006-09-08 14:20:03
·
answer #5
·
answered by smoot 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Truth hurts.
2006-09-07 22:30:24
·
answer #6
·
answered by joe b 3
·
1⤊
0⤋