why is chief justice roger taney important 2 the civil war?

Answer 1

Taney (pronounced TAW-nee)
Many abolitionists--and some supporters of slavery--believed that Taney was prepared to rule that the states likewise had no power to bar slaveholders from bringing their property into free states and that state laws providing for the emancipation of slaves brought into their territory were likewise unconstitutional. A case, Lemmon v. New York, that presented that issue was slowly making its way to the Supreme Court in the years after the Dred Scott decision. The outbreak of the American Civil War denied Taney that opportunity, as the Commonwealth of Virginia seceded and no longer recognized the Court's authority.

Taney continued to trouble Lincoln during the three years he remained Chief Justice after the beginning of the war. After President Lincoln declared martial law in parts of the State of Maryland and suspended the writ of habeas corpus, Taney ruled as Circuit Judge in Ex parte Merryman (1861) that only Congress had the power to take this action. Some scholars argue that Lincoln made an aborted attempt to arrest Taney himself in response to his habeas corpus decision, though the evidence is sparse, (see the Taney Arrest Warrant controversy). Lincoln ignored the court's order and continued to arrest prisoners without the privilege of the writ, though Merryman was eventually released without charges. Some Radical Republicans in Congress even considered initiating impeachment charges against Taney.

find lots here.......http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roger_B._Taney

hope i helped

Answer 2

extraordinary examine...uncommon on Yahoo!solutions these days. there may well be some similarities, because of the fact the biographical information on Roberts does point out that, as White abode information in the time of the Bush/Quayle administration and as criminal expert generic previous to that place, Roberts has continuously supported precise-wing stances, alongside with writing a coverage paper that recommended the overturn of Roe v. Wade. The Roger B. Taney heritage exhibits that he did no longer help Dredd Scott and actually supported the theory that persons of colour weren't completely persons and hence they may well be (and can be) denied equivalent rights. there's a sturdy hazard that chief Justice Roberts shares this prejudice which seems rampant between the applicable-wing Republicans and their teabagging evangelical extremist cohorts, quite while one considers the (i think of planned) mess-up of the Oath Of place of work while he replaced into assigned the activity of swearing in then-President-% Barack Obama, our u . s . a .'s first actual black President. The "electorate United" fiasco which claims that "firms are human beings" (a nullification of persons' votes between those employed in those firms) for which Roberts voted in desire facilitates overseas traders (UNNAMED overseas traders) to take over U.S. elections. This selection is ANTI-AMERICAN and is likewise INSANE. I shop hoping that between the applicable-wing extremist Justices will grow to be incompacitated---according to hazard even Roberts, who has a heritage of violent seizures that could propose he has epilepsy or another neurological impairment, or perhaps greater suitable, the unqualified conflict-of-interest-encumbered Clarence Thomas---so as that President Obama can hire his own reasonable. If Clarence Thomas keeps to be on the final courtroom (even although he does not should realize this), i think of an enticing appointment may well be Anita Hill, who replaced into sexually harrassed by way of then EEOC suitable respected Clarence Thomas.