2006-09-07 13:34:35 · 12 answers · asked by Bluebellofthefog 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Cultures & Groups ➔ Other - Cultures & Groups
Depends, there's nothing wrong with living in a minimilistic fashion(I don't see who could complain) but its not a life style for everybody.
2006-09-07 13:36:43 · answer #1 · answered by DonSoze 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
------My record will basically be the appropriate/worst teen books (for my section that I actual have study so far) appropriate-- a million) Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows (2007) 2) Harry Potter and the 0.5 Blood Prince (2005) 3) Harry Potter and the Goblet of hearth (2000) - as you will discover, i'm relatively of a Harry Potter nut 4) The starvation video games (2008) ----The plot grew to become into distinctive from what i grew to become into used to analyzing, which made it exciting. this is unhappy, yet unique, and extremely nicely-written. I enjoyed it. 5) Catching hearth (2009) 6) The Mortal device sequence (2009) ---some could argue that it isn't that nicely written yet I happen to think of this is an spectacular sequence. It has an rather staggering plot and hilarious talk. i like it. 7) the actuality approximately invariably (2006) -one in each of Sarah Dessen's appropriate books. this is an rather candy romance tale. 8) The Gemma Doyle Trilogy - Libba Bray (2007) 9) Poison learn- Maria V. Snyder (2005) WORST(no longer which includes some books I study for college)-- a million) Blue Bloods- Melissa De la Cruz (2007) - this is horrendous. Melissa spends most of the e book speaking approximately what outfits they're donning. i'm stunned i in my view have been given by way of it... 2) Catalyst- Laurie Halse Anderson (2002) -this is a bore. I in user-friendly terms study it because of the fact I enjoyed talk with the help of the comparable author. I attempt to no longer study books that I won't like so i'm no longer able to truly finished the worst record. Or i basically can no longer think of of them on the instant.... *I trust Goldfish's Blood and Chocolate (2007) with the help of Annette Curtis Klause. -It truthfully merits to be on the worst record.
2016-12-18 06:35:58 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Only minimally.
Just kidding. Although it's sometimes applied to people who abstain from worldly pleasures, which is neither good nor bad, the term is usually used when referring to art and design. It's kind of a bare bones, stripped down modern.
2006-09-07 13:48:37 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No-it is a choice. In architecture, residential housing , even furnishings, minimalism works quite well. The living area of our home is 'minimalist' in furniture, colour and atmosphere- I rather like it.
2006-09-07 13:39:59 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Regarding posessions, it's great to not be burdened with a bunch of worthless clutter.
2006-09-07 13:39:25 · answer #5 · answered by bereftcat 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No its a personal choice. I love living without clutter.
2006-09-07 13:42:03 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No it just shows you're tight
2006-09-07 13:37:05 · answer #7 · answered by jediruszkai 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i would so no. it is counters the mainstream message to over-consume...
2006-09-07 13:41:01 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Just a little bit..........
2006-09-07 13:36:15 · answer #9 · answered by yogangel7 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes, and all should be shot.
2006-09-07 13:39:36 · answer #10 · answered by E3_Army 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋