2006-09-07 13:02:15 · 18 answers · asked by OctopusGuy 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Bush leaves either way.
2006-09-07 13:04:35 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
If it wasn't for Bush and his stupid father, we would never have been stuck in this unwinnable war with no possible chance of a peaceful solution. Because of him there will be another attack and we have shown with his "Homeland Security plan" that we are as vulnerable as ever. He is an incompetent, bumbling, incoherant, illiterate moron and our country is full of fools that voted for him. I can't stand him and his gang of right wing cronies. Nuf said
2006-09-07 13:15:54 · answer #2 · answered by nicksriders 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The Israelis and Palestinians will first make their settlement throughout a delegated week of peace, after which will WWIII spoil loose (because this week of peace will be chop up by the midsection by technique of the sword).
2016-11-06 20:48:42 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This war is never going to end, so no. I'm in favor of getting him out before 2008 if at all possible.
2006-09-07 13:08:07 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
No, Bush has to learn that he cannot continually violate the U.S. Constitution which limits presidential terms to two.
2006-09-07 13:17:18 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No matter who the President of the United States is, they will have to defend the people of the United States of America, or they will be overthrown and or impeached immediately.
2006-09-07 13:09:07 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Absolutely not. We can handle a transition of power even during a war.
2006-09-07 13:05:48 · answer #7 · answered by Will 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
He'd have to be in office til 2050 then so no...not a chance.
2006-09-07 13:06:01 · answer #8 · answered by mymadsky 6 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Heaven forbid! The war would never end.
2006-09-07 13:06:03 · answer #9 · answered by Steve H 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋
bush should not be in office at all.
2006-09-07 13:52:37 · answer #10 · answered by Jasmine 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋