2006-09-07 12:49:25 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ History
Darwin really only touched on Natural Selection in his Origin of Species which is just one part of the evolutionary process. Try reading some Stephen Jay Gould and Richard Dawkins. In my opinion they do a wonderful job of explaining evolution. Once you understand it, it is impossible to ignore...
2006-09-07 12:53:15 · answer #1 · answered by simianfever 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Nearly everything Darwin theorized has been proven wrong again & again & again. Though archiologist have dug up things that prove the bible correct again & again & again. The only thing Darwin did right, was go to a theological seminary as a young adult , to become a preacher. So I guess my answer is , are you out of your mind, of course I don't
2006-09-07 20:00:48 · answer #2 · answered by Dionsays 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Darwin's theory of "survival of the fittest"
"Survival of the fittest" is open to interpretation. In the USA many people, specifically men, interpret it to mean survival of the most aggressive or nastiest or competitive.
I interpret "survival of the fittest" as survival of those with the strongest survival instinct.
2006-09-08 17:26:22 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Natural Selection fits the facts better than any other competing theory.
2006-09-07 22:14:51 · answer #4 · answered by James P 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes
2006-09-07 19:53:43 · answer #5 · answered by ecogeek4ever 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes.
What simianfever said.
2006-09-07 19:59:13 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
yep
2006-09-07 19:51:17 · answer #7 · answered by scoobydoobydoo 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes i do.
2006-09-08 15:21:36 · answer #8 · answered by scififed 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
YES!
2006-09-07 19:54:03 · answer #9 · answered by Bronweyn 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no because we did not evolve from any thing from the ape family but thanks for asking
2006-09-07 19:53:49 · answer #10 · answered by katlvr125 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋