d
2006-09-07 12:45:58
·
answer #1
·
answered by ĵōē¥ → đ 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
As provided, it extremely is secure to assert it extremely is an removing subject. this is why: in case you upload them, you will get: y=2x-3 + y=5x-18 _______ 2y=7x-21 which leads us especially plenty nowhere. yet whilst u "do away with" y via making: 2x-3=5x-18 3x=15 x=5 now replace x on any of the unique equations to get y y=2*5-3 y=7 you will get the outcomes. whether it extremely is honestly all with regard to the variety you notice it, by way of fact if u multiply any of the equations via (-a million) until now including, you will have the means to remedy it via addition, which would be especially plenty the comparable as "removing" y.
2017-01-05 03:48:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
That's confusing, you only need to equations two answer a two-variable simultaneous equation and the use of the word negative is not making sense. Do you mean:
y=2x+3
y=-5x
y=-(2.5-1.5)
2006-09-07 12:47:21
·
answer #3
·
answered by Jaq 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
If y=2x + 3 and y=5x
Then 2x + 3 = 5x
-2x -2x
3 = 3x
x = 1
Hope this helps. Good luck with homework.
2006-09-07 12:57:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm not doing your algebra homework for you, but plug in the numbers into the equation. Use order of operations; y= (2x) + 3.
-5x=2x+3
2006-09-07 12:47:25
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
What are you talking about? You have Y equaling everthing under the sun! This is not a math problem, you have a problem with math.
2006-09-07 12:48:28
·
answer #6
·
answered by Sprint Nextel 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
answer is 25
2006-09-07 12:45:09
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
that makes no since what kind of math are you taking if y=5x then it would be unsolveable
******R.I.P. Steve Irwin******
2006-09-07 12:51:53
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
quit trying to get people to do your math homework for you! lol
2006-09-07 12:45:54
·
answer #9
·
answered by UseAnotherNickname 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
my asss
2006-09-07 12:46:13
·
answer #10
·
answered by Miisz.RodRIguEz 3
·
0⤊
1⤋