No, your second sentence already has two verbs; that's plenty. Also, the second sentence isn't quite so closely connected to the first as to warrant a semi-colon.
2006-09-07 12:29:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by Goddess of Grammar 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
A semicolon is not necessary following the first sentence; it reads clear as is. The second sentence, having the word 'and' in it, balances both sentences.
By the way, you have a clever way to depict the word grammar, but I wouldn't recommend its usage all the time.
2006-09-07 19:36:48
·
answer #2
·
answered by Guitarpicker 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
That's a purely stylistic decision; the two phrases stand alone as sentences, so consider the effect of joining them into a single sentence.
OR:
That's purely a stylistic decision. The two phrases stand alone as sentences, so consider the effect of joining them into a single sentence.
I'd consider your audience; if they're relatively erudite and can manage sentences longer than seven plus-or-minus two words, then go with the semicolon. If you want to keep your sentences shorter and crisper, split them.
2006-09-08 10:40:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by Scott F 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Both ways work, but I really like the semi colon. It makes a more dramatic read.
2006-09-08 16:24:30
·
answer #4
·
answered by tealover 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, it sounds good the way you have it. I don't think it improves it any to put in the semicolon, but it wouldn't harm it either. Both ways work, in my opinion.
2006-09-07 19:29:10
·
answer #5
·
answered by Just Ducky 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Both versions are correct but I would leave it as it is.
2006-09-07 22:43:24
·
answer #6
·
answered by rhymer 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
hmm...you should.
2006-09-07 19:28:23
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋