Given the other choice at the time, yes. If there were a better alternative, no.
2006-09-07 12:29:21
·
answer #1
·
answered by Will 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Yes. I am satisfied with him, but just a little bit.
I am happy he is consistent with his policies and won't run away from Iraq. The cabinet he put together is very very good.
However, he lets big business keep our borders open, that is bad.
I believe he is TOO soft on terror actually. I would make these Muslims wish they never were born if I were prez.
Bush is a horrible communicator. He has his moments, and many people like his stumbling and bumbing routine, but I don't. We need a leader like Giuliani who can pick up the microphone, and clearly explain the war that is going on with our Muslim friends and motivate the people, they need it. We are in a war, and Bush should be making speeches each and every week, but due to shyness or whatever he doesn't, and that is a derelict of duty.
That said, John Kerry would be alienating the military and planting kisses on terrorists rear ends.
2006-09-07 12:30:06
·
answer #2
·
answered by TG Special 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Absolutely, he's done more for the economy since Ronald Reagan. Did you know that just over the past 11 quarters, dating back to the June 2003 Bush tax cuts, America has increased the size of its entire economy by 20 percent? In less than three years, the U.S. economic pie has expanded by $2.2 trillion, an output add-on that is roughly the same size as the total Chinese economy, and much larger than the total economic size of nations like India, Mexico, Ireland, and Belgium.
2006-09-07 12:29:53
·
answer #3
·
answered by MorgantonNC 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
I wasn't old enough to vote for him, but I would have. Yes, even if I could turn back time I would vote for him. Or course, I would also warn them about September 11th.
2006-09-07 12:27:52
·
answer #4
·
answered by shea_8705 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
Yes. Actually, the first time I did not. I'd be willing to vote for Tony Blair now as well (i.e., vote for labor), despite disagreeing with him on pretty much everything besides the war on terror.
2006-09-07 12:20:55
·
answer #5
·
answered by A professor (thus usually wrong) 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
no, i would vote for john mcain, like i did in the first place. and if it was him against al gore though? yes i'd vote bush
2006-09-07 17:43:48
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Considering who was running against him, yes, I would vote for him again. Were he able to run again, would vote for Mickey Mouse before voting for him because of his views on illegal immigration.
2006-09-07 12:25:16
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Yes I would vote for him again. I do not agree with everything his administration has done, or not done (illegal imigrants). But I very much approve of the way he has handled the terrorists. I believe that he has kept America safe.
2006-09-07 12:24:55
·
answer #8
·
answered by tiger 2
·
1⤊
2⤋
You bet ya!
He's far from perfect (who isn't), but a better choice than the competition. I've benefited from his tax deductions and I'm far from rich. He fights for Marriage being between a man and woman. He fights against the terrorists the best he can and persues them to the end. He's got gutts! I wish he could stay in office longer.
2006-09-07 12:24:48
·
answer #9
·
answered by Julie W 2
·
2⤊
2⤋
I dont like everything that he is done. BUt yes, I would vote for him again. He is a good president, it doesn't matter what anyone says. He has taken care of us for the most part.
2006-09-07 12:21:03
·
answer #10
·
answered by Katie 3
·
3⤊
2⤋