http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20060907150640AA6TQdk
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20060907142251AAmvUIo
2006-09-07 11:28:39 · 29 answers · asked by me 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
because USAdomot have a concept to go with it is not a matter of principles it is a matter of what you say you say yes then you are of no value like with my great sadness most arbic DECTATORS (so called presidents) if you say no then you are one of two things if you are a nonpowerful country and theusa know every thing you do you will be like iraq( nonpowerful means donot have the weapons needed to stop usa) if you like iran played the game well with great intellegence and make your enemy know nothing about your cards then you have the bigger chance to win that is iran politics is like a card game the more you are confident the more you make others lose their temper then you win,usa found herself dying in iraq every day and whole the CIVILIZED world are against her so there is noway except negotiations that is the whole matter i hope you say if you got me or not please because i cares
2006-09-07 12:23:25 · answer #1 · answered by egyptian one 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Is this a rhetorical question, or were you actually looking to spark up a debate? You probably are asking the wrong person, but I think they just don't want Iran to start with the nukes and become the next North Korea. North Korea, by the way, seems to have been forgotten now. I'm just glad we don't have another World War on our hands. At least, not yet! I hope, never. I have a question for you: Why did we ever attack Iraq? Are things better now?
2006-09-07 11:32:27 · answer #2 · answered by calamityjanedoe 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I am liberal. I am a Democrat, obviously.
I don't think we should negotiate with Iran for more than about 5 minutes. A country whose belief system says it is OK to lie in negotiations to further Islam can NEVER be trusted in negotiations.
I believe in live and let live. I do not think we should invade Iran. I think we should announce to the world that we feel Iran should be allowed to do whatever they want BUT if they should ever use a nuclear weapon, or if they should ever supply a nuclear weapon to a terrorist group that we incinerate their country.
As long as you leave others alone we will leave you alone. As soon as you nuke others we will nuke you into oblivion.
2006-09-07 11:34:21 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
it truly is straightforward to respond to. Liberals are about administration. So, there is not any grievance even as a authorities has total administration. Liberals have continuously needed administration & have succeeded in various places. in case you seem in heritage, the kings of Europe had many of the social administration: the authorities & the church. there have been few that would want to have sufficient money practise, nutrients or possibly a Bible. Then got here the social reform of the great Awakening.
2016-11-25 19:41:27 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'll tell you one goddamned good reason to negotiate: Because our country hasn't been able to quell the Iraq issue, and Iran is tactically impossible to take, and all the ninnying by the Idiot Sun Prince and Condasleeza Rice won't change that.
2006-09-07 11:42:36 · answer #5 · answered by TurboLover 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If you look at recent history you'll find that the last president to negotiate with Iran was Ronald Reagan. I don't recall Reagan being Liberal.
2006-09-07 11:31:43 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Becuase diplomacy is the way to get thru this problem.
Since dumb-a** bush has completely commited most of our forces to Afghanistan and Iraq, we have no ability to militarily force Iran into anything.
I guess by your line of thinking we should start ANOTHER war before we use diplomacy and alliances to figure a way out of this.
Iran is conservative-- Conservative radical waco Muslims.
2006-09-07 11:32:00 · answer #7 · answered by dapixelator 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
~Wherein lies your confusion?
Are you suggesting the points are inconsistent?
Enlightment is not possible for those incapable of reasonable, rational thought.
The liberals try to negotiate with the right wing bible thumpers and their lackies in Congress, too: in spite of the foregoing premise.
2006-09-07 11:34:19 · answer #8 · answered by Oscar Himpflewitz 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
We ALL want to negotiate with them, even Bush. NOBODY wants them to have nuclear weapons. And yes, they are the definition of why church and state should be seperate. If anything no liberal would want to go there unless it is to negotiate with them.
2006-09-07 11:32:42 · answer #9 · answered by miggity182 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Where did you get that silly notion, we don't give a damn about those 5th century dumbells, they couldn't build a nuke if their existence depended upon it. were just humoring them... you must have far to much time on your hands to think of a dumbass question like that
2006-09-07 11:34:46 · answer #10 · answered by fritz 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋