2006-09-07 11:20:37 · 9 answers · asked by Chris M 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Hard to say...
If you look at the Bush family, as an example. The apple doesn't fall far from the tree.
If you look at the Clinton family, Bill and Hillary are married, and have their own personalities from different families growing up. So although we are looking at two families with the possibility of the same circumstances, the out come may be completely different.
2006-09-07 11:38:34 · answer #1 · answered by Joe K 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. whether Franklin Delano Roosevelt served extra beneficial than 2 words, the twenty 2d exchange, handed on February 27, 1951, 6 years after Franklin Delano Roosevelt served his 4 words, prohibits thereafter any President, after he serves 2 words in a row, from working for President a 0.33 consecutive time, or ever lower back, because of the fact of this same guy or woman won't be able to be President ever lower back after he serves 2 consecutive words: "no person would be elected to the place of work of the President extra beneficial than two times, and no person who has held the place of work of President, or acted as President, for extra beneficial than 2 years of a term to which somebody else became into elected President would be elected to the place of work of the President extra beneficial than as quickly as."
2016-12-12 04:26:15 · answer #2 · answered by vogt 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I know you are thinking 4 Bush, 8 B. Clinton, 8 GW. Bush, and then possibly 4 Hillary Clinton. It would be a lot negating what happened in the years before them. It may end up being a giant wash.
2006-09-07 11:25:48 · answer #3 · answered by miggity182 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Generally speaking, no. Whether it be Hillary Clinton or Jeb Bush as the next prez (both unlikely to win it, IMHO), the concentration of power along bloodlines could raise doubts about the validity of our electoral system and potentially undermine public faith in our democracy.
2006-09-07 11:35:59 · answer #4 · answered by Dave of the Hill People 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What about over 200 years of distant relatives being president? That's the Illuminati, and their royal bloodlines.
2006-09-07 11:36:34 · answer #5 · answered by oceansoflight777 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Dual-monarchy... the obvious fear would be a lack of variety, but I think anything's possible.
2006-09-07 11:27:26 · answer #6 · answered by Paul 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
if it were even possible I would doubt it would be a good idea for many reasons
2006-09-07 11:25:20 · answer #7 · answered by topgunpilot22 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
umm no it wouldnt and hilary isnt going to win
2006-09-07 11:27:06 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why not?
2006-09-07 11:45:47 · answer #9 · answered by Zee HatMan 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋