The. U.S. should provide the planes, tanks etc. to the Palestinians. Then they could fight the Israelis without needing to use themselves as weapons.
2006-09-07 11:07:25 · 15 answers · asked by rumpled 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No. That'll just give them another way to deliver the payloads.
A much better method, already successfully used after WWI would be to bury the remains of every Muslim suicide bomber with a few table spoons of ground pork.
Since based on their superstition that will keep them out of heaven, their main incentive to kill themselves will be gone. No more 72 raisins....
Israel is our bulwark against all that killing over there.
2006-09-07 11:09:39 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Another moron graces us with yet another stupid (cough) Question. As if it's all Israels fault. The innocent people of Israel are forced to move out of their homes in Gaza so the terrorist Palestinians can move in and "have a country". But the minute they move into their newly acquired land they start launching rockets at Israel.
It's not Israel, dummy. It's the Muslims of that part of the world that want ALL jews in Israel to be dead. We hear it every day, and the president of Iran even proclaims that it is his duty to see it happens.
When will you kool-aid chugging libs see the truth?
2006-09-07 11:13:23 · answer #2 · answered by Cambion Chadeauwaulker 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
the most acceptable approach ought to nicely be to attack the source of the guns quite than the bombers themselves. There no longer a lot to be carried out to discourage or punish a suicide bomber. by technique of definition they don't position any fee on human existence. attempting to capture them before is in all probability to be next to no longer plausible. so that you want to concentration on making them irrelevent. What makes the trendy terrorist risky is the effectiveness of his guns, more advantageous mobility, and press coverage. by technique of focusing the wrestle in Iraq we've addressed one out of three. I positive wish Bush's plan will commence impacting the provision of weaponry. i do not carry out a lot wish for proscribing the end results of press coverage. Legally and almost they could't be curtailed and that i'm no longer positive that i'd like to besides. i assume in some unspecified time sooner or later the international turns into de-sensitized to the undemanding explosions. i do not see it taking position each and every time quickly. WW2 became the perfect time we regarded that there are some issues nicely worth sacrificing for. so as that leaves me with one couple of minutes period and one lengthy time period answer. the couple of minutes period answer is to close the Iraqi borders and interdict any abnormal crossings. next run cordoned sweeps in the course of the country which get rid of guns and weapon making cloth. The 0.33 component is to discourage mobility. lengthy time period, we want to get rid of economic factors from their disposal by technique of committing to different gasoline sources. The irony of present day society is that the international economic equipment is fairly depending on a unmarried source discovered mostly contained in the least solid area of the globe. all of us recognize this and characteristic no centralized attempt to regulate it. i quite do not care no matter if the insurgents are satisfied, unhappy, or at a loss for words see you later as they are constrained to sticks and stones and isolated from some thing else of the civilized international. they have representation of their new authorities to voice their opinion and enact substitute. at the same time as they play by technique of the regulations, they could rejoin the international. until eventually then they want to be isolated.
2016-11-06 20:38:22 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ignoring your flawed argument and the fact that the US are pro Iraelis.
You cant stop suicide bombers, they will always find a way.
2006-09-07 11:10:11 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I got a better idea.
Give them a bottle of booze and a few chicks to bang. Then they won't have to go to paradise for a piece of ***.
2006-09-07 11:29:00 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
How about the US should take away those weapons from Israel and have both countries duke it out like in the Kung Fu movies.
2006-09-07 11:13:44 · answer #6 · answered by Egroeg_Rorepme 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
and then ther would be nothing left of U.S. since if they had those weapons theyll blow up the whole world if they could
2006-09-07 11:10:59 · answer #7 · answered by sasha 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
US law prohibits aiding terrorist organizations. Humas is such an organization, thus no aid to Palestine.
2006-09-07 11:10:53 · answer #8 · answered by mymadsky 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
can you imagine Israel fighting a opponent of equal power? Bet they'd cut and run.
2006-09-07 11:14:11 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
We should provide them all with bombs with short fuzes so the only people that they blow up is themselves.......
No, we should not arm them..........
2006-09-07 11:10:23 · answer #10 · answered by whidd2003 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋