English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

31 answers

lol i totally agree she was an alcoholic junkie hooker who would do anything 4 a pint of rough cider!!!!!!!!

2006-09-12 02:15:27 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

First of all, I am so shocked as to why you would even consider using such foul language to describe a pure soul like Mother Theresa. We as a human race have been so lucky to have witnessed such an angel walk this earth during our time.

Secondly, I am amazed by your deranged and disturbed personality. You scream for so much attention.

Thirdly, I am sitting here wondering what went on in your mind when you actually sat down to write such vicious words about someone who never did anything wrong to you at all.

Finally, I bet you anything you want, that if Mother Theresa was alive today, and you told her this to her face, she would probably smile at you and then touch you with a blessing. If only you could have been that lucky, my friend.

May god forgive you and bless you, never the less.

2006-09-09 11:15:41 · answer #2 · answered by Chandru M 6 · 0 0

I'm happy that for once, someone spelled Whore correctly, however, I am not at all pleased with your question calling her a whore. That is VERY wrong, especially when the person in question had such a positive impact on the world. She was incredible because she believed in something, and did something about it. That's all you have to say.

2006-09-07 17:59:10 · answer #3 · answered by Sirius Black 5 · 0 1

Mother Theresa was a remarkable woman and if there was another side to her younger life i have no knowledge of that but i think whatever the facts you are being very disrepectable to a gracious lady

2006-09-14 11:29:02 · answer #4 · answered by srracvuee 7 · 0 0

Great headline! Offensive in a gramatically pleasant way and better than why F*in this an that you see a lot of.
With the dirt being dished on the catholic church in general, the years of abuse by MANY of its priests (sorry, Factual!) and the subsequent, and prevoisly ongoing cover ups by the church, evidence is being told more and more now, as the poor and illiterate, and ex "church" people begin to recant real tales of this "saint". She reportedly has a sinister streak, keeps the poor, poor, in bad conditions, and promotes "suffering" as being healthy and bringing people closer to god, making them grateful for what they've got, etc...similar to the "pennance", "going to hell", "maryterdom" of the catholic church ethos.
She has not helped poor people out of poverty, but kept them there, on charity to perpetuate her own worth.
Even she has factually been reported to have promoted suffering, to increase religious awareness, as her own opinion.
The other respondants on this page are talking nonesence, stifling your opinion to expression, and in terms of going to hell, Wrong. It does not exist. It is wrong for them to imply you would, or would suffer, by raising an opinion. Many respondents clearly show they know nothing, as they refer to her as a great, yet evidence, and more than one documentery, demonstrate she, is at least NOT beyond the total reproach the clearly ill informed respondents think she is.
Any question, unless gramatically over obusive, deserves at least Informed debate. To simply call you names, threated damnation etc, That is offensive.

2006-09-07 18:27:45 · answer #5 · answered by ben b 5 · 0 0

why would you call a woman who dedicated her life to helping others such a name,i will pray for you.

2006-09-07 18:51:54 · answer #6 · answered by nanny2 4 · 0 0

Wow, you're in the express lane to Hell! Congrats, have a nice time. Sacrificing your life to help other people=an incredible whore? You're hopeless, but I'll pray for you anyway.

2006-09-07 17:59:58 · answer #7 · answered by babalu2 5 · 0 2

Prat

2006-09-13 18:01:29 · answer #8 · answered by Warlock 3 · 0 0

Can you possibly feel good about yourself for talking that way about one of the greatest people of God who has lived, and who dedicated her life to help those in need? I feel bad for you.

2006-09-07 17:56:10 · answer #9 · answered by ryanjamesm 3 · 1 1

She wasn't. She was a good person who was even recognized by the Nobel Society. What's YOUR problem?

2006-09-07 17:56:38 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

If you had any sense of humanity or common decency you would remove this senseless and offensive question. Shame on you.

2006-09-07 18:06:21 · answer #11 · answered by Raymo 6 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers