English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Remember when there was that whole issue with the indestructable passport - the one found amidst the smolder debris of bodies and steel? Remember also how the FBI suggested that some of those accused of the hijackings might have had their IDs stolen?

Hijackers alive:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2001/09/23/widen23.xml
FBI Investigates Identities:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/1553754.stm

Then how Osama had his confession tape, NAMING the hijackers?

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2001/12/20/attack/main322092.shtml

How could the ring leader praise hijackers who weren't involved?

In all honesty, shouldn't these questions be answered? Shouldn't there be a more thorough investigation? Even members of the 9/11 Commission are writing books regarding the fact that we aren't being told everything. They stop short of accussing the government of anything, but it raises questions.

As Americans, left or right, shouldn't we investigate these inconsistencies?

2006-09-07 10:52:19 · 21 answers · asked by DEP 3 in Politics & Government Politics

Submarine...

did my question imply conspiracy? nope. you would have jumped on Clinton if he did so much as get a BJ in...the....oval....nevermind.....

2006-09-07 11:00:23 · update #1

Andy...C'mon. You know I ain't a lib so don't respond to me as such. Gimme more credit...

and Truckman...

9/11 Commission, LIBERAL?? THEY WERE CHOSEN BY BUSH AND WERE BIPARTISAN!!

2006-09-07 11:09:10 · update #2

ANDY - also how would a tape that was recorded BEFORE 9/11 have Osama speaking of Atta and the attack in past tense?

"Not everybody knew (...inaudible...). Mohammad (Atta) from the Egyptian family (meaning the al-Qaida Egyptian group), was in charge of the group," bin Laden said on the tape, according to the government.

2006-09-07 11:30:59 · update #3

21 answers

Yes we should but with a completely republican congress... we won't. They have no integrity... they don't even know the meaning of the word.

2006-09-07 10:58:19 · answer #1 · answered by BeachBum 7 · 1 3

Yes, more investigation is needed but hey what's the point,

The Govt. Just Quashes Whatever Info It Wants anyway; Media, Net Or Otherwise,
The Trick Is They Make It Appear That everyone still has "Free Speech"

You Might As Well be Living In North Korea
With All The Propaganda The Govt. Has Fed Us.

(Have You Noticed How many People Who Had Been Completely Impartial Before Are Now
Completely Against America & It's Govt.?)

I WONDER WHY?

2006-09-07 10:54:20 · answer #2 · answered by Spaghetti MY 5 · 0 3

I didn't want to believe that there was a possibility that Dictator Dumbya, as evil as he is, would be a mass murderer of American people. But as time goes on there are just too many questions, a small example of which being yours, to just ignore. It will/would take an no-nonsense Democratic Congress, preferably BOTH houses, with subpoena powers to make what you want happen. I hope you are working for that. Down with Dictator Dumbya!!!

2006-09-07 11:04:34 · answer #3 · answered by rhino9joe 5 · 0 0

http://www.prisonplanet.com/

Watch(1minute 15 seconds in) ALex Jones predict 9/11 and says the government will blame Bin Laden on July 25, 2001, three months before the attacks.

2006-09-07 10:59:05 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

To tell the truth I do understand that this was really horrible but that was about 4 years ago it is wonderful if we get answers and solutions that would help us in anyway to make people feel better but I really don't think we should stress because of this anymore but if somthing else like tis happen in the U.S then we go back to 9/11 and care alot. but til then we need to worry about the prestent and future. and yes I do know that we are in war but nothing all that bad bad has really happen in the past couple of years but if you disagree with me send me and email at: phantomgurl152@yahoo.com

2006-09-07 11:04:33 · answer #5 · answered by Bri 2 · 0 0

The 9/11 “truth” movement is a network of people living on shoddy reporting, bad evidence, embarrassingly horrible science, and outright lies.

Let me describe them to you, they believe in every conspiracy theory from the JFK assassination to Bigfoot. They also believe all the events of 9/11 were connected in one grand, all encompassing conspiracy theory which of course is controlled by the Jews.

They think they’re brilliant, but show no capacity for logical thinking whatsoever. They rarely present, discuss, or consider other points of view, since any other point of view is--well, evil.

2006-09-07 11:01:19 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

convinced, yet people will disagree with what passes as "valid." might want to there be a actual study into 9/11? relies upon on what ingredient. the authorities and coverage mess ups? That replaced into regarded into with the help of the 9/11 fee, yet that replaced into actually a whitewash. truly of a bi-partisan fee, they must have one led with the help of a NON-partisan fee. Then there is not any longer a reliable want to absolve each body of any blame. might want to there be an study into why the homes collapsed and what brought about them? there has been, with the help of objective, impartial scientists, and the study are not from now on executed yet (WTC 7 record remains being worked on). those findings of reality are available for diagnosis with the help of the clinical community at great, open to grievance and peer evaluation. they have been discovered to be precise and objective. the area with the allegations with the help of scientists and professionals is that the scientists are not commenting on their fields of technology, and the professionals are not professionals contained in the fields touching on to the criticisms. So, no, those have oftentimes been thoroughly debunked. in the adventure that they have got leigitimate criticisms, they could be in a position to put up them in peer reviewed technology journals, and lets hear what the professionals contained in the sector at great imagine of their ideas. the very undeniable reality that they don't, and actually put up them on internet internet sites or dramatic video clips might want to allow you to know all you want to study about their legitimacy.

2016-11-25 19:38:47 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

after reading these links over carefully I have a conclusion 1. I was infromed by libs on this sight that telegraph was not reliable. Maybe What I showed them to hurt their feelings made them say that 2. the video shown is old and was done before the attack proving that the terrorist reallyattacked 3.This type of "news" and "reporting" is just that; a conspiracy theory nothing more!

2006-09-07 11:00:31 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

911 commission were all liberals trying to protect clinton,but i guess Monica put that cigar up her,you know what for grins,and saved somebodies Else's D.N.A.to spit on her dress! Maybe you should be wondering how all this mess we are in managed to happen in only nine months of Bush's, being elected!but eight years before that everything was just peachy,in the world,no Cole attack,no first twin tower attack,no cobart towers,no U.S. embassy's being attacked in Africa,none of this ever happened,did it DORK!

2006-09-07 11:02:52 · answer #9 · answered by truckman 4 · 1 1

Spend more tax payers money for Sandy Berger to walk out of the archives with more documents shoved down his pants that the 911 commission wanted to take a look at?And what happened to Sandy Berger..,he got a widdo spankey.,but let Karl Rove do that and lets burn him at the stake..,its that type of B>S> is the reason I am no longer a democrat..,I am so ashamed of that party now.

2006-09-07 10:59:02 · answer #10 · answered by halfbright 5 · 0 2

I am so glad you wrote this question. I have read alot of articles on the net and I agree with you that something isnt right. There should be an unbiased investigation done. I know that will never happen though because it just might totally disgrace some higher ups in our regime, oh sorry I mean government.

2006-09-07 10:56:19 · answer #11 · answered by shirley e 7 · 3 3

fedest.com, questions and answers