English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

13 answers

yay!
historically the reason pot is illegal is because of Hearst and Dupont wanting to make more money, not because of the effects THC causes.
alcohol is dangerous, legalize the herb.

2006-09-07 11:17:19 · answer #1 · answered by phalsephasod 3 · 1 0

Nay, the real a million% will purely be taxed on 250K, because that's each and each and every of the earnings they get. some thing else of the money is in different sources that do not take position as earnings. the individuals interior both percentile do not have that luxurious and maximum of them run businesses. So no this finished tax the wealthy component is a scam.

2016-11-06 20:35:20 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I would say yes - lot less dangerous than the ones getting drunk on alcohol and driving...if anything, from what I've heard and seen it makes a person more cautious. There are so many other horrible drugs that I have heard impair a person so tremendously - I haven't heard the same about pot.

2006-09-07 10:46:48 · answer #3 · answered by Peachz 2 · 0 0

Yay. The plant has so many uses.

2006-09-08 12:57:55 · answer #4 · answered by Bill 3 · 0 0

Nay... Pot inhibits the thinking of an individual...
Of course, in today's society...? Who'd notice...?

2006-09-07 10:46:14 · answer #5 · answered by KnowhereMan 6 · 0 0

I would say yay yay yay yay yay

2006-09-07 17:13:12 · answer #6 · answered by halfpint 4 · 0 0

I would vote against it.

The government is already supporting too many drug addicts with my tax dollars.

The pain killing component in pot is available without the addictive component. Pot leads to problems with a lot of other drugs for many people that use it.

2006-09-07 10:48:21 · answer #7 · answered by Automation Wizard 6 · 0 2

yay, sue baby

2006-09-07 10:45:56 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

double yay!

2006-09-07 10:45:19 · answer #9 · answered by miss_nursie_nurse 4 · 0 0

nay, it would just be one more lobby group to distract out government.

2006-09-07 10:45:17 · answer #10 · answered by turtle girl 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers