Liberals think we have stopped looking for Bin Laden, why?

Question

Why do you say this? You have no proof of this. And if we were finished looking for bin laden would we even be in Afghanistan?

Answer 1

Liberals are incapable of thinking outside of the box, of course we are still looking for him.

Jim W. don't take my comment so personally. Our government isn't going to give up everything they are doing, even if the libs want them too. You have turned distorting facts into an art form, rant on.....I've got things to do.

Answer 2

tonythelion2003 is dead on, bush personally said that Bin Laden was marginalized to be a non issue to quote him verbatiim. But just this week he reiterated that we really need to get our hands on him. For starters Bin Laden is the nephew of a Saudi Prince and not an Afghanistani Rebel. He was vaulted into power to assist the Afghan rebels resist the Soviets attempted takeover of Afghanistan, this elevated him to leadership. He is pissed at the US for doing the "Bay of Pigs Shuffle" on him and his freedom fighters. This cost the life of his brother and other family members. Number two, it is no secret that big bush ran the CIA for years and is also an oil man who regularly slept with the Saudis with the US consumer as the target. Number three) little bush and cheneydick are trying to get a pipeline through Afghanistan from the Caspian Sea for Natural Gas distribution. With that much money on the line and the regular leaders of Afghanistan, those who were against the Taliban who were assassinated, out of the way completion of this energy grab will go forward. Not to mention the poppy/heroin business which is small potatoes compared to the amount of money they will make off this pipeline deal. The heroine is only to throw a few crumbs to local law enforcement here in the states. Use the "ever increasing crime rate" crapola to keep the voters in line. So no, we are not really looking for Bin Laden but if i were him, i would definitely go into hiding until after the 2008 elections. Killing him right before the November primaries would do wonders for the bush team and anyone he endorsed. The republicans would retain majority control over the whitehouse and the patriot act and martial law would definitely follow after another inevitable terrorist attack. It is coming, its no longer a question of "if" but "when". This will also scare the poop out of everyone who is weak and stupid. Cries for the govt to protect us will ring like a bell and the patriot act which pretty much creams the constitution anyway will become status quo. Bin Laden, if he escapes the november elections will be back but not hunted like the propaganda machine would have you to believe.

Answer 3

Open your eyes.
Your so-called liberals are not the only ones who say this.

Here's a quarter, buy a clue:
recent news reports (see link) clearly show that American tactics have shifted from the search for that b*stard Osama and the elimination of the terrorist Taliban group.

We're losing ground in Afghanistan.

And what the hell are we doing in Iraq?
I don't recall ANY evidence that Osama or the Taliban were there or had a foothold in the government.
I won't even go into the fact that Saddam had NO weapons of mass destruction...let alone any evidence of terrorist cells.

And since America now has itself stuck in Iraq (just like the Uncle Remus story about the tar baby - and President Bush would be the Brer Rabbit character), is that not proof enough we've avoided a serious search of Osama?

Oh, and let's add a new diversionary tactic to avoid the fact that Osama is still missing: IRAN!

Is it not clear to you that Osama is NOT a priority?
Use your brain, think!

Answer 4

It's a question of resources. Bin Laden is moving between Afghanistan and Pakistan in a very large area, while eluding a relatively small US military presence of less than 20,000 troops. He is not in Iraq, where we have approximately 140,000 troops. If the situation where reversed it would be possible to make a legitimate claim that we're really looking for him. As it stands now, we're just holding our ground in Afghanistan.

Answer 5

They say it because it is easy to say and hard to prove wrong. Until we actually capture/kill bin Laden, people are absolutely right when they say that we're not doing enough to find him.

When bin Laden is found cowardly hiding with a family, the same people will scream "Murder" when we are forced to destroy the family that is sheltering bin Laden. Too bad... even a great victory is a loss to some people.

Answer 6

You have no proof Bush is really interested in FINDING Bin Laden and helping this country in the first place.

Aha!

As Rosi I demonstrates,conservatives are incapable of thinking outside of the box.How the hell anybody can be fooled we are "looking" for him is a joke.Wake up.Bush hates America more than the terrorists do for chrissake!

Answer 7

i am going to respond to a question with a question.(I might want to were in politics, except i'm unable to inform a lie)Q. What did the present dude in charge of Afghanistan do before the U. S. placed him in charge? A. He replaced into the vp of Unical Oil, the employer it is construction the pipeline from Kazahk, and a significant different of Dick Cheney. Q. Why are Canadian's demise in Afghan? A. Canadians are demise in Afghan because they help Oil and medicines and the country demise gadget. Oh yeah, also, Canadians are very ignorant. isn't all of it fantastic and fantastically with beautiful digital camera's set up on each nook. In precis, you need to bypass to Afghanistan and connect up with some "pleasant hearth"

Answer 8

WELL MAY BE BECAUSE ON T.V. JUST LAST NIGHT BIG BAD Bush SAID THAT bin laden was not important any more.
Check NBC if you want the whole story.

Answer 9

stop labeling people, just say fag lovers with no sense of fact from fiction. oh cause if we really want bin laden he would be found. u think the us military suck that much? there is an agenda out there and its not complete... we need bin laden out there..

Answer 10

It just seems like we have because of the current Bush administrations failure to do anything right.