English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

the following day for security reasons, this has been proven. Does this not demonstrate that the government knew what was about to happen?

2006-09-07 09:13:20 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Government

He is on tape if you can be bothered to find it. Just like Larry Silverstein admitting that WTC7 was demolished with explosives. Check out the following link http://www.metacafe.com

and type "Ignorant Americans" in the search bar

2006-09-07 10:32:42 · update #1

18 answers

they knew

2006-09-07 09:22:33 · answer #1 · answered by toecutter 3 · 0 0

Where is the proof this happened. And I don't mean some 3rd dimension webpages that put up hearsay and gossip and supposition.

This garbage has never been proven.

And if he got a call not to fly SFO to NYC so what? That only proves that they had no idea where the attack was going to center from so they covered their bases.

Him flying SFO to JFK would not have been a problem because the skyjackers were on United Flight #175 BOS to LAX and American Flight #11 BOS to LAX.

The only flight that had anything to do with San Fran was United Flight #93 and that was originating from Newark to San Francisco.

Any way you slice it, he would not have been in danger.

Nothing you posted has ever been backed up with facts.

On the other hand, if Clinton had killed Osama while he was authorizing cigar games from his oval office desk, maybe this day never would have happened.

2006-09-07 16:37:19 · answer #2 · answered by alwaysbombed 5 · 0 0

For the same reason Scottland Yard warned Salmon Rushdie not to fly. All the players in the loop knew there was gonna be a lot of aerial chaos that day what with the multiple simultaneous war games being conducted by NORAD-FAA- USAF- Pentagon-FEMA.

Great day to have the boogieman actually carryout the operation. Facts would get lost among all the exercises.

2006-09-07 16:23:56 · answer #3 · answered by mikeygonebad 2 · 0 0

The 9/11 “truth” movement is a network of people living on shoddy reporting, bad evidence, embarrassingly horrible science, and outright lies.

They believe in every conspiracy theory from the JFK assassination to Bigfoot. They also believe the events of 9/11 were connected in one grand, all encompassing conspiracy which was orchestrated by the Bush Administration or Israel or Larry Silverstein or the “Illuminati” as part of their secret plan to rule the world. Take your choice.

They think they’re brilliant, but show no capacity for logical thinking whatsoever. They rarely present, discuss, or consider other points of view, since any other point of view is--well, evil.

2006-09-07 18:52:22 · answer #4 · answered by zippychippy 3 · 0 1

We might as well face it, there are and will continue to be things that the government has sole control of and they will keep us in the dark at our own expense. That's why I'm getting ready to move to Canada, eventually.

2006-09-07 16:18:11 · answer #5 · answered by Rica_Venia 3 · 1 0

because he is a good administrataor and he is also a good discipline and right hand and good adviser and good plan maker so he call the mayor of san francisco and he is also capable to do every thing in us and no one can defeat him any cost if he self stand on his own strength

2006-09-08 03:05:50 · answer #6 · answered by name of spritual tantra horr0r 3 · 0 0

who knows why, considering that flying to new york was safe that day, it was flying out of new york/new englind that was dangerous. i think your just reading to much into this. next thing you know you will be comeing out with the idea that Al Gore not OBL was behind the attack. (he has moditve he lost the election)

2006-09-07 16:20:02 · answer #7 · answered by Pyros South Texas Rejection 2 · 0 0

Wow!!! Rock solid proof! You've cracked it! Someone call the New York Times!! This'll certainly blow the roof off the whole thing!!

2006-09-07 16:16:00 · answer #8 · answered by jamie 4 · 1 1

The FBI did admit that they had prior knowledge of something was going to occur sept 11th. I guess thats why she warned him.

2006-09-07 16:19:54 · answer #9 · answered by PHILLYGUY 3 · 0 0

It was actually because a death threat (later proved to be from a high school student in sacramento) threatened to attack him on his way to meet with President Bush. But nice try.

...besides, why would she want to protect a bleeding heart liberal.

2006-09-07 16:15:31 · answer #10 · answered by Chris B 2 · 1 1

Show us proof not conspiracy theorist blog crap you may believe that crap but anyone with half a brain knows it's crap to flushed with the rest of the lies posted by liberal wackos of the extreme left..

2006-09-07 16:17:37 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers