English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Only two small fires in the building, no jet hit it, no jet fuel in the building, it came straight down like a controlled demolition.

2006-09-07 09:11:11 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events Other - News & Events

PEOPLE: I am talking about World Trade Bldg #7, NOT the Twin Towers.
NIKKI H: No jet hit WTC 7, JACKASS!
There was no structual damage to WTC 7 from the collapse of the Twin Towers, WTC 7 was not structurally damaged by debris from the towers.
And mostly, how about the FACT that New York City's Emergency Command Center was located in WTC 7? As well as a few federal government offices? THAT makes ME suspicious.

2006-09-07 16:05:47 · update #1

13 answers

the u.s. is being fed way to many lies by our president. this needs to stop as soon as possible. more people should be aware of what is happening, and i'm glad that slowly people are finding out...

but to answer your question, i am completely sure it was an inside job... by our own government. the buildings fell with the help of explosives, that were used to take out the main support beams. assume the buildings did catch fire from the other buildings (as some mislead people might think), but the buildings were burning at a temperature higher than jet fuel can burn, by at least two thousand degrees, therefore proving that there were explosives involved.

if you could, please find the video "loose change", or "loose change II" to back up what i have already mentioned (plus more)!

2006-09-07 13:13:54 · answer #1 · answered by haha183 2 · 2 0

Have you see the documentry called Loose Change.

It is very amazing. I believe it was a controlled demolition.
If you watch some vidios there are explosions down way below the air plan hit and makes it look like bombs were planted.
Either the terrorist planted them or it was an inside job. Scary isn't it? Also how did the building melt down so deep in to the lower level parking areas. There was a stash of Gold there I am told.

Be sure and try to get a copy of that DVD a & pass it on.
I take all information with a grain of salt & don't instantly believe anything.......but this DVD is very complelling

2006-09-07 16:29:27 · answer #2 · answered by clcalifornia 7 · 1 0

I have a question.Did any buildings other than those in theWorld Trade complex collapse that day?There were so many buildings in the surrounding area that if a building such as WTC 7 collapsed what , if anything, made one building more structurally sound than another.(especially when there was no impact, no jet fuel to weaken the structure).I just don't get it,it doesn't make sense.

2006-09-07 17:06:32 · answer #3 · answered by gussie 7 · 1 0

Well i hope i have got your question right and you are sincerely interested to know what could have been the main reason of twin towers to collapse
like you said a controlled demolition but a matter of fact it was the result of cascade effect, to explain this....
if you have plane hitting on top floors plane breaks weakens all the column and pillar support witch comes from foundation and if you have thirteen floor or so falling as result of plane crash on next floor down to it. the floor down simply cannot take the weight of above thirteen floor and collapses to next below floor and so on with each floor this is call as cascade effect but to onlooker it looks like an controlled demolition.

2006-09-07 16:28:32 · answer #4 · answered by dubai chaser 3 · 1 1

The 9/11 “truth” movement is a network of people living on shoddy reporting, bad evidence, embarrassingly horrible science, and outright lies.

They believe in every conspiracy theory from the JFK assassination to Bigfoot. They also believe the events of 9/11 were connected in one grand, all encompassing conspiracy which was orchestrated by the Bush Administration or Israel or Larry Silverstein or the “Illuminati” as part of their secret plan to rule the world. Take your choice.

They think they’re brilliant, but show no capacity for logical thinking whatsoever. They rarely present, discuss, or consider other points of view, since any other point of view is--well, evil.

2006-09-07 19:41:54 · answer #5 · answered by zippychippy 3 · 0 2

Who told you no jet fuel?? Both planes were FULL, they had just taken off! To go on long flights!
Once they severed the top part, the weight crashing down, took the rest of the buildings. Did you ever look at one of the shows disecting why it happened? Or have you been under a rock for the past 5 years?

2006-09-07 16:18:09 · answer #6 · answered by fairly smart 7 · 0 3

It was a scheduled demolition that had been in place for some time. The fire dept knew about it and the owner raked in millions from his insurer.

2006-09-07 16:19:30 · answer #7 · answered by diaryofamadblackman 4 · 0 0

yes it is so painfully obvious that a missle struck the pentagon not a jet how could anyone in their right mind NOT see this?? people who blindly believe in this traitor george bush need to go live in isreal or something im very scared for my country

2006-09-07 16:45:05 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Because it was badly damaged and had more than just two small fires

2006-09-07 16:16:33 · answer #9 · answered by L3-knightw1zard 4 · 0 0

because some dude told some other dudes to knock it down after it had gotten REALLY bad damage from the WTC'S falling

2006-09-07 16:13:11 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers