I just want to point out the true double standards of liberals. When Moore put out his lie filled movie, did you see Dubya acting like Clinton? Where's the tolerance and understanding for this movie? Have the liberals already CLOSED their open minds to an opposing veiw?
2006-09-07
09:02:49
·
30 answers
·
asked by
therandman
5
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
JIM - If you think this movie is going to make democraps look or sound bad you are sadly mistaken. They do a damn good job of making themselves look & sound bad just by opening their pie holes, and the majority of Americans know this.
And what is it with your ilk? Why does everything have to be about YOU?
2006-09-07
09:15:44 ·
update #1
Neddie - you guys like the kinda made up facts that Dan Rather & Mary Mapes create! Is that why he is still the CBS anchorman? Because he lies and produces false documents?
2006-09-07
09:29:13 ·
update #2
I don't remember a single time when Bush tried to stop Fahrenheit 9/11 from being shown. Although, that garbage was TOTAL, COMPLETE liberal spin.
Furthermore, I don't know what liberals are afraid of. Most of them have not seen the movie yet. Watch it, judge it. Do any of us REALLY know what the truth is with regards to the lead=up to 9/11? No, not really. I just don't think Clinton should not have been so defensive, it makes him look like he DOES have something to hide.
Maybe Sandy Berger, with documents from the national archives stuffed in his pants and socks could shed some light on this for us.
2006-09-07 09:11:53
·
answer #1
·
answered by sacolunga 5
·
2⤊
6⤋
Democrats before civilrightsact were very much antiblack antirights. - not 100% true anymore
Gop before the 1950's were definately about the rich - not been true since.
LIberal demos own the party now - still true.
though there are some good demos;
Liberals only care about their own views, all other views are wrong.
Lieberman, my local mayor, Edwards (not kerry or edkennedy or either clinton)..
GOP is not owned by the right though many like to think it is.
Demos love to call anybody that disagrees with them 'nazi's.
which in terms makes demos look pretty stupid.
Considering that "PATH" is a a lot more accurate than F911 was, and that there was no democratic uproar then, its goes to show how closed minded demos are.
F911 - about 55% wrong per my own view.
PATH - about 90-96% right.
Thats even trying to be a 'demo advocate' and actually being unfair to PATH... And even giving F911 benefit of doubt on some lies.
Above alone makes me want to see this movie.
I didnt bother paying $$ to see F911 because of the innaccurancies. There are not enough in Path to do same.
2006-09-07 16:57:29
·
answer #2
·
answered by pcreamer2000 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Giving Clinton some degree of cupability in the times leading up to 9/11 would be damaging to the Democratic party, and to Hillary - so hence, the crying on the left side of the aisle.
It also damns the whole Democratic treatment of a War on Terror - an approach that treats it as not a "war" but as an action of law enforcement, and being stuck on the "legally" of doing something rather then on the "morallity" of something - ie, the legality of killing someone like Bin Laden versus the morallity of just going ahead and killing Bin Laden.
2006-09-07 16:16:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by B C 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
Former President Clinton is a liberal icon, not to mention they don't need anything to take the focus off of what they consider President Bush's failed administration. I find it interesting that ABC may have given in to the demands of the Clinton attorneys (at least that's what I heard a bit ago). Isn't it funny how a movie can be made depicting the assassination of President Bush, even using his likeness, and not one person seems to disapprove? I support President Bush, and think he has done a great job, not perfect, but given the type of enemy we are fighting I do think he has and is doing a great job. He doesn't whine, he simply does his job, to me this is the mark of a true leader. Someone said today that the entire Clinton legacy is made of talking points, not truth, if anything new or different comes out that challenges those talking points it will harm his legacy. (What ever that is). Thanks
2006-09-07 16:15:49
·
answer #4
·
answered by rosi l 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
Let me point of out the double standard of conservatives.
You can bash me on "tolerance and understanding",which I never told you I was all for,but I cannot criticise conservatives for hypocrisy. Hmmm.
Not everyone is trying to censor this movie.Moore tried to tell everything he could about Bush's motives,and the bitter consequences,of Iraq. Path to 9-11,however,does seem more
peppered with opinion.
Showing the rows of coffins,as Moore did in Farenheit 9/11,was to demonstrate what many Republican stategists did not want the public at large to see,and with good reason.
Whether you like it or not,the Republicans right now,especially the extremists,will do just about anything right now to make a Democrat look or sound bad,impersonation of me included.
2006-09-07 16:09:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
4⤋
This is typical behavior for the democrats. Where is their outrage about the movie with Bush being assassinated? I haven't heard Bush make any comment about that horrendous excuse for a movie. But, of course, we all know the democrats fear the truth about their actions and lack of leadership in the years leading up to 9/11. They ignored the problem. I can't help but laugh every time I think of Clinton saying after 9/11 that when he was in office he was obsessed with Bin Laden. HA! We know what he was obsessed with!
2006-09-07 16:11:40
·
answer #6
·
answered by angelicsanto 3
·
1⤊
3⤋
Democrats = totalitarian state.
Thats why.They want to put 911 down the memory hole so as to give Clinton a pass.
the fact is he dropped the ball BIG TIME. And now the world will see the TRUTH.
I wonder if they will have the infamous Sandy Berger stuffing classified documents in his socks...accidentaly of course
2006-09-07 16:19:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by smitty031 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
Here's the thing, the entire Democratic party's philosophy is a house of cards. Take away one card and their whole philosophy comes crashing down. For instance they say that war never solves anything...kind of funny considering we wouldn't have a country if not for war, and the jews would have been eradicated if not for war. Liberals can't handle it when something actually makes sense, so they spew their propoganda (furthered by the news media) in the hopes that americans (and most do) will simply believe what they see on T.V. It's a sad state of affairs but thats how it is...
2006-09-07 16:14:08
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
Because Bill screwed up. The democrats want Bush to fail and now we have discovered oil Iran is scared. When we got hit by the terrorists on that boat what did Bill do ..NOTHING. Bill was too busty playing with his Monica (I DO NOT KNOW THAT LADY MONICA). 911 proved that Bill cut the budget of the CIA and we frankly were not enformrd. If Hussen was taken down Iraq qould be selling nukes to whoever wanted to bring the US down.
2006-09-07 16:11:54
·
answer #9
·
answered by spook12spook12 2
·
2⤊
3⤋
well first.. Bush Co. did have a cow over Moore's movie...
and second... we'll see how fair it is... there were clear failures in both admins... we'll see if that's reflected...
I think Morre's movie was a lot of propaganda...we'll see if this is any better...
2006-09-07 16:42:41
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋