March 2006
And no the violations were not removed. Actually more were added that are very controversial. Go figure....
2006-09-07 08:28:30
·
answer #1
·
answered by BeachBum 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
6 months ago,, and their are sections that violate the constitution that were not removed,,, I don't think Congress will uphold the Patriot Act without removing them,,, remember Paul O'Neill,,, we would have to go back 150 years,,, to be the kind of United States that George W. envisions........
2006-09-07 15:46:49
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
When the libs voted FOR it, after bloviating about how they had killed it. They wanted this and that, but they caved because they knew to vote against it was political suicide. And remember, all that matters to a Dem is political power. National security is a distant second or third to them, behind getting illegal Mexicans and felons the vote.
2006-09-07 15:34:35
·
answer #3
·
answered by christopher s 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
April or May of 2006. And yes, the sections previously held to be unconstitutional were updated.
2006-09-07 15:28:58
·
answer #4
·
answered by coragryph 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
define violations? Or do just tend to call Iraqi alot?
2006-09-07 15:35:05
·
answer #5
·
answered by lana_sands 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Be very happy. The Patriot Act is saving American lives.
If you are a terrorist, be unhappy.
2006-09-07 15:30:39
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋