This film blames Clinton and the Democrats for the 9/11
attacks and it is a gross misrepresentation of the facts.
Was put out by the Republicans as a prapaganda series without comercial interuptions. Look at yahoo.com the news about it.
How are they able to do this? Isn't this slander and lies?
2006-09-07 07:44:23 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
to read the article go to: war turns southern women away from GOP
Then down to the bottom:
clinton officials protest 9/11 TV series
2006-09-07 07:51:55 · update #1
the people mentioned in the movie said,
That never happened.
It was a misrepresentation of facts
Shouldn't we believe the people who are quoted as saying somthing they said they didn't
2006-09-07 07:58:59 · update #2
All of these films are strictly propaganda. The attacks of 911 are both the demorcats and republicans fault. The CIA helped carry them out, there is no other way such a major operation is able to be done. A majority of our government is incredibly corrupt. They are looking for war because it means big bucks in defense contracting. All the propaganda being fed to the american people are lies and misrepresnted truths. Just look at the WMD junk being tossed around first on Iraq and now on Iran. Bullshit lines like we cannot wait for the "mushroom cloud" as evidence are said by Rice and Bush in order to scare and fear the american public in to submission, turing over liberties and rights that the free world and common men devoted their lives for. As a whole, american must wake up and realize that their is a sinister group of people controlling the country (as well as the world) and that if we dont do somehting about the corruption we shall fall like every other empire before us.
2006-09-07 08:20:48 · answer #1 · answered by nyrattles75 1 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I haven't seen any of the specifics about this program, but I do know this: President Clinton was warned on more than one occasion about the threat of Osama bin Laden, and the first attack he masterminded at the World Trade Center happened during the Clinton administration. I also know that the Sudanese government contacted the U.S. State Department and offered to hand bin Laden over, but Clinton blew them off, and this was four years AFTER the first World Trade Center bombing. BOTTOM LINE: If Clinton had taken action when he had the chance, it's possible that the 9/11 tragedy may not have happened. Now, it's entirely possible that it may have happened anyway, but it's hard to ignore the fact that he was handed the Al-Qaeda leader on a silver platter and didn't accept the generous gift the Sudanese government was offering.
2006-09-07 14:50:49 · answer #2 · answered by sarge927 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
LOL.....I am amazed at the overreactions. It is advertised as a DOCUDRAMA, not a DOCUMENTARY. Now, you tell me which is worse, a docudrama that claims to be based on the bi-partisan 9-11 report....OR a so-called "documentary" full of lies and misrepresentations (such as those put our by Michael Moore), that claims to be true?
WHAT are the Clinton fans afraid of? Why are they prostesting so much? Are they afraid we might see that we ALL failed--republicans and democrats alike? Or, are they just spoiled and shocked, because they are so used to main stream publications tilting to the left?
Everyone should get a grip, for goodness sake. NOONE has even seen the final edited version of the movie, according to ABC, as of a few minutes ago. Those who say it's full of lies obviously DON'T KNOW. They are just being overly defensive.
2006-09-07 15:01:59 · answer #3 · answered by Rose 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Gosh.... if this is not proof that the mainstream media is controlled by the left wing then I don't know what is.
The very FIRST sign of criticism of a Democratic administration on a mainstream media channel (CBS) and the Demo(gogues) go crazy and threaten to boycott.
How many "mis-representations" have been aired about Bush???
Hmmm... Dan Rather gate... the latest conspiracy theory of Joe Wilson / Valerie Plame / Karl Rove that has been debunked... all the chemical weapons found in Iraq post war....
.... and these were not just a "dramatization". These were real world "mis-representations".
What a bunch of crying weanies. Can't take what they dish out.
2006-09-07 15:24:47 · answer #4 · answered by jakobmccandles 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
docudrama is a VERY dangerous word... just like Rush Limbaugh is a political opinion show...
just because they say it's "fictional"... it doesn't mean there won't be people on here the next day spouting that "IT WAS IN THE SHOW, IT HAS TO BE TRUE"... just like the do with Rush...
if it supports their opinions, people don't care what label you put on it, they are inclined to believe it... now, I haven't seen the show, but I'm very curious that I haven't heard any reaction from he Bush administration on it... there were CLEAR missed opportunities in both administrations and if it only focuses on those during Clinton... that's a gross misrepresentation, if you ask me and a bit socially irresponsible when you're talking about an even like 9-11...
I guess we'll see what it is...
2006-09-07 15:16:49 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Its fictional but follows the events that led to 911. ABC is putting out the film - I didn't realize they were conservatives. Are you saying that they are comparable to Fox news? Where do you stop the spin?
How about the lie filled Moore movie? Did you hear the administration or conservatives try to censor that crap from the public? You need to learn that media is a 2 way street that can be used both ways.
2006-09-07 14:53:55 · answer #6 · answered by therandman 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
How the hell do you know its propaganda? 9/11 was not planned the weekend before. The terrorists trained in our country for several years. Because Cliton says its fiction you believe him. Remember he was convicted of lying to a grand jury? No, of course you don't. You can't see beyond your hatred of W. Clinton had bin laden in 93 and let him go. Think about that.
2006-09-07 14:54:47 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
You are overstating the situation.
There are supposedly inaccuracies but I'm sure there is plenty of truth in the docudrama as well. The move is supposedly based on the 9/11 comission report.
It's not a Republican propaganda series....
The problem though is that there are way too many stupid people in this country and they'll believe just about anything.
Geez people, get a grip.
2006-09-07 14:47:25 · answer #8 · answered by dapixelator 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋
If I had a TV, I'd watch it if it was unedited. If I had a TV and it was edited to mollify the Democrats, I would not watch it. To say that a five-hour TV show will damage the legacy of Clintoon is to put stellar proof on it as to how incompetent he was as President and how he gave us the terrorist problem we now have. He did nothing after so many attacks, choosing rather to protect his poll numbers instead of the country.
2006-09-07 15:21:30 · answer #9 · answered by christopher s 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I am going to boycott everything advertised on ABC from now on. No more trips to Disneyland, ever. This is so evil.
Lets get this straight from the top: Clinton warned Bush about Al Qaeda, Bush said he was interested in Iraq. One of Bush's first acts on becoming Pres was to abolish Clinton's anti terrorism committee which had successfully broken up 3 big plots. This is the most evil lie I have ever heard. Down with Disney, their broadcasting licenses need to be cancelled, they need to be in jail. Fraud is a crime.
2006-09-07 14:47:20 · answer #10 · answered by jxt299 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋