I had a real estate investor offer a "subject to" purchase of my home. I understand the basics of it (he takes ownership of the house and continues making my mortgage payments until he re-sells the house, etc.), but it almost seems too good to be true. What are the problems or risks I would be taking on by selling my house this way? Is there a catch? Would I be better off selling my house the old fashioned way?
2006-09-07
06:39:24
·
3 answers
·
asked by
XZiLLr8
1
in
Business & Finance
➔ Renting & Real Estate
To add a few more details (and hopefully I am understanding & explaining this right)...it was explained to me that the buyer (real estate investor) would take on ownership of the house, he would get power of attorney with my lender & continue making my mortgage payments until he sells the house to someone else (which he claims is a pretty quick turn around). He re-sells the house (at a higher price) to someone who needs owner financing (ie, to people who are at a disadvantage of having bad credit, etc.) and that's how he makes a profit. When the house gets re-sold, our mortgage gets "paid off" and the process is complete. All of the paperwork has been drawn up by his attorney...he claims it's all legal, legitimate, & a quick way to get our house sold.
2006-09-07
09:54:32 ·
update #1
I have my house for sale. I am not in financial trouble. So why would I tell the housing authorities and move out? Maybe you misunderstood my question...
I am just trying to get more info on the pitfalls/problems with selling my house to this "investor" as a "subject to" purchase.
2006-09-13
06:04:56 ·
update #2