Sounds more like something on Fox News.
2006-09-07 06:30:33
·
answer #1
·
answered by darkemoregan 4
·
2⤊
4⤋
First, how do you know it is propaganda? It is about events leading up to 911. Well those events started in the early 90s. Only the last 9 months were under a Republican administration. So what was the movie writers supposed to do, say the Green Party was in power during that timeframe?
But beyond, that Republicans were upset about Farenheit 911 but never called for it not to run. Path to 911 is a docudrama, as was Farenheit 911.
What is good for the goose is good for the gander. So, deal with it.
2006-09-07 14:21:37
·
answer #2
·
answered by kathy_is_a_nurse 7
·
4⤊
0⤋
Anyone who watches American network television these days and actually believes they are seeing/hearing responsible reporting on any political issue is probably never going to be able to distinguish truth from lies anyway, let alone even try.
Most intelligent individuals go elsewhere for their news. They may pay attention to what the current talking points are, or what propagandists are currently spreading in the interests of being able to counter such disinformation, but they are no longer credulous enough to believe information coming from such blatantly biased sources.
Doesn't matter which political party you support; by now, you had better be aware that American media reporting is not to be trusted as factual.
ABC can air whatever they choose; responsible people who want to know the truth can watch, and do their own research, as always.
2006-09-07 13:45:03
·
answer #3
·
answered by functionary01 4
·
3⤊
0⤋
Honey if it's on ABC I can tell you it will not have a Republican Slant, it will probably more than likely point out any failures that they think the President might have that contributed to 9/11. Read Chapter 4 in the 9/11 Commision Report. Form your own opinion.
2006-09-07 13:32:56
·
answer #4
·
answered by fire_side_2003 5
·
3⤊
1⤋
Notice all the discussion and news about this "entertainment event"?
Have you considered these politcal accusations may be a very clever approach by ABC to get lots and lots of free advertising for the show. So they can edit to to blandness now, and still get great ratings.
2006-09-08 16:37:35
·
answer #5
·
answered by Rjmail 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, libs have FINALLY found something too offensive to be broadcast: criticism of a Democratic Administration (even with the sop of some criticism of their favorite target, George W. Bush).
Actually, make that TWO things--NBC is censoring the Christian-themed Veggie Tales episodes they plan to start airing, cutting down or eliminating any pesky references to God. That's right, I've said it, GOD. Our kids can be bombarded with offensive, inappropriate programming during the "family hour", but let's not allow them to hear anything about GOD!!!!!
Liberals are funny.
2006-09-08 14:11:40
·
answer #6
·
answered by smoot 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, if you know the truth, then you know that it portrays the truth. I see Spike Lee showing his factually incorrect propaganda that he is calling a documentary. ABC is telling everyone up front its a dramatization, but its based on true events.
What's wrong, don't like it when the shoe is on the other foot?
2006-09-07 13:32:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Sure, just as long as they run a disclaimer that not all the facts are considered the absolute truth. Otherwise, why was it ok to fire Dan Rather? What's good for the goose should be good for the gander. From what I read, the truth will come out anyway and this will backfire in their faces!
2006-09-07 13:35:57
·
answer #8
·
answered by CharlieB 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
How am i supposed to work,listen to Rush Limbaugh and answer biased questions all at once?Unless you are some kind of critic,you haven't seen it yet anyway.
You libtards need to keep it real once in a while.
2006-09-07 13:36:54
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
We have a free press and it's up to ABC and I can watch or not.
2006-09-07 13:32:39
·
answer #10
·
answered by longroad 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
Should you ask such a biased question? Have you seen it? Then how can you pass judgment on hearsay? That doesn't sound very intelligent to me.
2006-09-07 13:30:53
·
answer #11
·
answered by Brzo Biciklo 5
·
4⤊
0⤋