So, Bill Clinton is telling ABC-TV to pull their miniseries "The Path to 9/11".
Imagine the howling from Hollywood and the media if Bush tried to stop "The Daily Show", "The Colbert Report", "Bill Maher", "Fahrenheit 9/11", anything by Spike Lee or MTV?
Bill Clinton gets criticized by one lousy tv show and he proves how thin-skinned he is.
Bill Clinton, as president, was more concerned with chasing chubby interns and kicking Cuban boys out of the country while our biggest enemy DECLARED WAR ON THE UNITED STATES DURING CLINTON'S PRESIDENCY.
Bill Clinton took tough stands on v-chips, school uniforms and safe grocery carts but he didn't crap about Al Qaeda's growing power and influence around the world.
Bill was more concerned with hitting the Saudis for millions of dollars of contributions to his presidential library instead of asking them to arrest the men who killed our troops in the Khobar Towers in 1996.
2006-09-07 05:58:34 · 15 answers · asked by FERNANDO 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Most of your 'facts' are incorrect and are, in fact, things that are being made up or way over-exagerrated by ultra conservative news outlets to try and take some of the focus off Bush and the massively horrible decisions he's made.
2006-09-07 06:06:02 · answer #1 · answered by CarlaCCC 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋
I would think ANYBODY who is misrepresented would at least want to see what is being said about them. I don't think he's trying to censor. Of course, ABC DID send the preview to Rush Limbaugh of all people-- why should HE get to see it before somebody who IS represented in the docudrama.
Just like the show you are making stuff up and distorting facts. Did you not know that he issued an executive order to assisinate UBL? Not even Bush has done that much less even come close. At least we came close to getting him under bubba. Calling off the attacks on him were the doing of the military and intelligence agencies for fear of collateral damage.
You people need to move on with your pathetic lives. Bubba has been out of office for over 6 years.
2006-09-07 06:12:35 · answer #2 · answered by dapixelator 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
FINALLY? Been drinking the wacko right-wing kool-aid have ya?
Clinton was criticized quite a bit when he was in office, that's part of what made it difficult to get legislation passed. That and Starr trying to hamstring him at every turn.
But he did a good job, all things considered. Certainly it could have been better and the Clinton administration missed some opportunities, but they weren't an absolute train wreck like the Bush administration.
2006-09-07 06:06:34 · answer #3 · answered by C-Man 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Notice all the discussion and news about this "entertainment event"?
Have you considered these politcal accusations may be a very clever approach by ABC to get lots and lots of free advertising for the show. So they can edit to to blandness now, and still get great ratings.
2006-09-08 09:39:03 · answer #4 · answered by Rjmail 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you'd actually read the news articles about this news event, it isn't because the mini series is critical of Clinton, but because it apparently misrepresents the truth and distorts it with false information. That is NOT covered under free speech as ABC can't go around making shows that are presented as documentaries and contain known falsehoods.
2006-09-07 06:06:42 · answer #5 · answered by azrael505 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Bingo..,what great points..,he manage to supress Linda Tripp and sick the IRS on her and make her life miserable..,kewl guy huh?Now that the ABC movie about 911 and how it came about..,he doesnt want that to be aired and they are doing everything they can because it actually shows the real truth behind the attacks and how that problem was ignored during his administration that led to sept.11.
2006-09-07 06:09:34 · answer #6 · answered by halfbright 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
in my view..you are 100% CORRECT...republicans are not jumping up and always screaming about how clinton totally messed up getting bin laden, yet democrats have no problem bashing bush for any small thing...sorry that president bush has a mind of his own and doesnt have a wife telling him everything to say or do...minus an intern
2006-09-07 06:19:51 · answer #7 · answered by Michael D 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
whilst became into he censured? Andrew Johnson became into the only President to be censured, yet that became into later expunged. Democrats cautioned censuring Clinton as a substitute of impeachment, yet he became into impeached as a substitute.
2016-10-14 10:23:19 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bill Clinton, was not critized for one lousy show!!
Clinton, was critized because he came in his lover dress!
And for citizens, he never did nothing!!!
Khobar Towers? where are those?? Egypt?
he had relations with his lover more than once in the White House, his wife and chelsea sleeping there!!!
2006-09-07 06:05:30 · answer #9 · answered by alfonso 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋
YES!!!! Just shows that this idiot and the Democrats can't handle the truth. If this Bush doing this BS, The liberal news media would be Howling about it until President Bush was long out of office.AMEN to the rest of your TRUTHFUL STATEMENT!!!!!!
2006-09-07 06:03:13 · answer #10 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 2⤊ 4⤋