Theory that Changes The Big Bang and challenges E=Mc2 Is it possible?

Question

( THEORY 29 866 6548374 )

to grasp this you need to understand the universe and this idea

no matter = no distance

the next part of understanding this is the idea that e=mc2 can be reversed from
energy = mass X light X 2 into...
mass ( at C2 ) = energy
but why C2? why not just C Because... ( do, read on... ) We are already expanding at the speed of light


so when mass reaches C2 it breakes up and creats a explosion of unimaginable proportions ( eg. big bang )

the idea is that in the original universe E = MC because we were effectivly sitting still ( well atleast not expanding at the speed of light )
( refer to no matter = no distance )

so the idea is that after the original big bang matter is expelled at the speed of light ( us, now )
therefore for another big bang mass would need to reach 2X the speed of light to release the energy
I I
I I
V

think of being on a moving train, on that train moving in the opposite direction of travel if you run at the same speed the train is moving you will feel like you sitting still
try that in reverse

but that also means if we could 'implode' light at C1 ( note we are EXpanding ) then we could send the universe back 4 billion years... no need to worry about global warming then ey.

POSSIBLE???

Answer 1

Adding to what kris said,

The basic premise of no matter = no distance is false. Photons are not matter, and are without relativistic mass (see link), but you can measure the distance between them and/or the frequency, which gives you the distance between two peaks or troughs.

Secondly, E=Mc^2 is an expression of energy as it relates to mass and velocity. The higher the velocity, the more energy. Mass also increases at relativistic speeds, requiring more energy to keep the object accelerating toward light speed. If an object were to reach light speed it would have infinite mass and require infinite energy to retain that velocity.

So the second premise is also false: the universe is not expanding at the speed of light. That is, no body with mass within the universe is moving at c, although the cumulative velocities of our galaxy and some other may add up to c.

It is, however, theorized that the enormous gravity waves of the Big Bang caused inital expansion of the universe to significantly exceed the speed of light, carrying the primal matter outward much faster than would normally be possible. The matter itself would have had significant velocity as well (relativistic velocity, which means that time for a given particle wasn't the same as time for the universe as a whole) but, relative to the expansion of space, it was sitting still and riding the wave. So, while the observable universe may be 20 billion light years in diameter, it may have taken much less than 20 billion years for it to expand to that size.

Answer 2

Umm, while some day we may find that we were wrong about the big bang and lots of other stuff, today is apparently NOT that day.

First off, it's E=mc^2, energy equals mass times the speed of light *squared*, not times two.

Secondly, in E=mc^2, the speed of light is just a constant - you don't have to make the mass go any particular speed to turn it into energy. This equation just tells you how much energy you would get if you turned mass into pure energy, but it doesn't tell you how you can do that.

Answer 3

Check on the membrane theory the whole concept of big bang changes.Actually some scientists believe that big bang was neither BIG nor a BANG!! Your concept of big bang is like entirely different from the believed version. As einstein says nothing can reach the speed of light except for light itself!!
Another fact is that mass varies with velocities => c .

Just gave some points to be considered . Figure out answer yoiurself!!


Keep twinking!!

Answer 4

Anything's possible in nature, thus in science too... That's the whole point of science, versus religion since you don't blindly believe in science, you try to understand and change if someone before you got it wrong... No hard feelings there...

Answer 5

How can you feel like you are sitting still whilst running ?

Answer 6

get on it