2006-09-07 04:54:02 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
The leader of Iraq a few months ago said they would be ready in the last quarter. It appears they are somewhat ahead of schedule. Very very good.
2006-09-07 04:59:56 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Did you know that Iraq took over the Armed Forces today?
What's your point?
2006-09-07 12:00:08 · answer #2 · answered by Pitchow! 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
You mean the Armed Forces which never should have been disbanded in the first place? And when they were disbanded, kept their weapons and then started shooting Americans and Iraqis with them? And who still can't operate without American logistical and air support? Those Armed Forces?
By the way, I was a staunch republican before 2003, and I'm thoroughly disgusted with the current administration's fiscal policies. Smaller government, yeah, right.
2006-09-07 12:02:43 · answer #3 · answered by 006 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Does that mean bush is getting out of Iraq? It is just a gesture for publicity. Nothing to it.
2006-09-07 12:33:17 · answer #4 · answered by P P 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's because nothing in Iraq has changed.
2006-09-07 11:58:54 · answer #5 · answered by jerry f 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Its been in the news this morning.
_____
Over the next year to 18 months, he(General George Casey) said, Iraqi forces would retain the "substantial presence" of U.S. troops in support. But pressed on when most Americans might leave, he said only that much would depend on conditions and Iraqi government decisions.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060830/ts_nm/iraq_dc
Division - 10,000 to 15,000 soldiers. Usually consisting of three brigade-sized elements and commanded by a major general, divisions are numbered and assigned missions based on their structures. The division performs major tactical operations for the corps and can conduct sustained battles and engagements
http://usmilitary.about.com/od/army/l/blchancommand.htm
____
One stinking Division.
Don't tell me you still believe that IRAQI FREEDOM/IRAQI DEMOCRACY CRAP?
2006-09-07 12:12:52 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The term "total control" leaves MUCH room for discussion.
2006-09-07 12:14:10 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Iraq has input but not control .
2006-09-07 12:00:04 · answer #8 · answered by playtoofast 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
That's because it was a Bush, Cheney plot to alter the outcome of the last election !!!!!! Sorry, I just figured I 'd say it before one of these fruit loops decided to !!
2006-09-07 12:10:03 · answer #9 · answered by bd5star 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ok I will.
I'm not too easy about it.Do I think it will run smoothly in the long run?No.Not because I "hate Bush",but statistically,the chances for more problems are there.
2006-09-07 11:56:40 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋