I BELIEVE THAT IT IS VERY POSSIBLE. I THINK THE CHURCHES WANT TO KEEP US UNDER THEIR CONTROL, HOW ELSE WOULD THEY STAY AFLOAT W/O OUR MONEY..
2006-09-07 04:47:22
·
answer #1
·
answered by ? 6
·
1⤊
3⤋
What Dan Brown said in HIS book was fiction, but his book was based on a NON-FICTION book called "The Holy Blood Holy Grail"
I do not believe what Dan brown said, because he made up a lot of plotline to make the story more interesting or exciting and in doing so, strayed or changed some of the fact.
I do find a lot of what is in the Holy Blood Holy Grail to be very interesting and very plausible. The book sticks to the actual Fact. Documented proof. To make it's case, and although I have heard many people asking about the validity of Dan Brown's book I hear very few mentioning this one, which is the Basis for Dan's entire theory. Read HBHG.
2006-09-07 04:59:54
·
answer #2
·
answered by Cerebrus 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Most of what Dan Brown wrote in the Da Vinci code is based on claims made by a man who was convicted of fraud, and is historically inaccurate. Mr. Brown is a good writer, but not a good historian.
2006-09-07 04:47:03
·
answer #3
·
answered by cbhoov1 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
The Da Vinci Code is fiction. you could ask the author in case you go with. yet is fiction that consists of: a million) techniques that's real yet wasn't established by technique of a lot of human beings. 2) debatable research that you could believe or no longer. any such large kind of people study / discovered knolewdge by interpreting a fictional e book. and likely that's why a lot of human beings ought to imagine that's non fiction.
2016-11-06 19:59:35
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The book was fiction but yes there are certain parts of the book that I totally believe in. The main thing is that I do think woman had a much bigger role in those days than anyone wants to admit.
2006-09-07 04:49:43
·
answer #5
·
answered by green eyed lady 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
nope! it's not true... it's just a fiction! dan brown used history and the bible and not to mention twisted it just to prove that The Da Vinci Code is real... when in fact it is not.
2006-09-09 02:08:48
·
answer #6
·
answered by caige 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Facts were correct for the most part. But it is a work of Fiction. If he had actual hard evidence that Mary Magdalen had Christ's child do you think it would have been written in a Fiction Novel?
2006-09-07 04:50:40
·
answer #7
·
answered by brandon 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
I believe what Dan Brown said of his book "IT IS A WORK OF FICTION!!!".
2006-09-07 04:49:44
·
answer #8
·
answered by eva b 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Dan Brown is a Magical story teller and he almost convinced that it is a truth.However one must not forget that it is a fiction based on Myth which is not true.
2006-09-07 04:54:20
·
answer #9
·
answered by shri 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
I think he had some interesting ideas and it definitely made the reader thing about the origins of Christianity and the politics of the church. Ultimately, it was just a fun action novel.
2006-09-07 04:46:33
·
answer #10
·
answered by grandbendbeachboy 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
It was a book of fiction and written to make money not to start a new religion or rewrite an old one.
2006-09-07 04:52:41
·
answer #11
·
answered by purplehays 2
·
0⤊
1⤋