English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

7 answers

The problem is that viruses show signs of being both alive and dead. The life status of viruses is still being debated. Here at my school, half of the professors say viruses are alive, the other half says the opposite. That said, I doubt they will give viruses any kind of taxonomic rank until they are declared alive or dead.

2006-09-07 13:22:01 · answer #1 · answered by TravelingMan 1 · 0 0

Obligate parasites are also not alive without their host, but they are still classified as "Life." Even viruses infecting their host are not alive. They are cellular artifacts. Look up the six characteristics of life: http://mimi.essortment.com/characteristics_rbrc.htm

2006-09-07 04:48:17 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

the phylogeny is distinctive. With the three domain names we can place the organisms in a tree and instruct distinctive evolutionary backings of each. notwithstanding, with the 5 kingdoms, it doesnt artwork so nicely, this is why we replaced it to this new gadget.

2016-12-18 06:20:53 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

A virus is not considered an organism. A virus isn't alive without a host. It's more of a molecule.

2006-09-07 04:32:36 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Scientists donot consider virus as a living or non living thing bcoz it is alive within d host and dead outside d host..So it is not included under any classification....

2006-09-07 04:58:18 · answer #5 · answered by vedala 2 · 0 0

viruses aren't part of the animal kingdom. they can't exist without a host.

2006-09-07 04:38:53 · answer #6 · answered by shiara_blade 6 · 0 0

Because for this purpose, viruses are not considered to be living.

2006-09-07 04:34:56 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers