2006-09-07 04:08:44 · 16 answers · asked by Damon 1 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
The director's cut is better sequenced and let's many subtleties slowly unreel that never came to light in the director's cut.
The original release was being hurried by the studio and Scott [director] did not have time to finish edit. The studio invited Harrisio Ford into a sound studio to create narration. He agreed with the director it was unnecessary and purposefully read slowly, poorly without much dramatic edge. In the hopes it would get shelved. (The narration, not the movie.) It was used and it works as a homage to film noirs like Bogart, etc.
2006-09-07 07:32:31 · answer #1 · answered by bluedecker97 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i recognize Bladerunner, yet I wasn't more desirable inspired with the director's decrease as I loved the movie noir kind voice overs even after gaining expertise of that Harrison Ford did them deliberately badly because neither he nor Ridley Scott needed them. and that i presumed the techniques that Deckard replaced right into a replicant further no longer something. besides the undeniable fact that the DVD is being re-released contained in the fall, hurrah! i love it because it supplies a severe tech yet pessimistic view of the no longer so some distance destiny, each thing is truly grungy, there are flying vehicles and Harrison Ford and Rutger Hauer are cool. And the proper scene is the only with the little robots and Darryl Hannah and her raccoon makeup, that's largely extraordinary.
2016-11-25 19:04:50 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The director's cut. It is actually the film that the director wanted you to be able to see instead of the one that the movie companies made him put out.
2006-09-07 04:18:39 · answer #3 · answered by moviegirl 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
director's cut aaaall the way! it's a adaption of a novel by phillip k. dick (not sure which one) but when he saw the cinematic release he thought it was so crap and he asked not to be credited
2006-09-07 06:21:15 · answer #4 · answered by Lenny. 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the dcut tightened up the logic cinematic version was a wonder as well but george once said movies aren't released they escape
2006-09-07 04:25:20 · answer #5 · answered by Book of Changes 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
cinematic release has the narration tells more about the story
2006-09-07 04:41:28 · answer #6 · answered by s.ville 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree I like them both, I actually liked the narration gave it a nice retro private detective movie feel.
Still one of the best cyber punk movies around - wish they would make films of the other books.
2006-09-07 04:15:45 · answer #7 · answered by Paul B 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the directors cut, just for the unicorn scene, makes you think deeper after seeing that version
2006-09-07 04:54:45 · answer #8 · answered by chockybikky 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Director's cut, for sure.
2006-09-07 04:13:55 · answer #9 · answered by Tefi 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the directors cut is always better
2006-09-07 04:11:37 · answer #10 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋