Principal over politics.Here is the list of Senators Who clearly saw this was a War For the profit of Bushs' Corporate Sponsors....If you Senators' name is NOT here FIRE THEM! We pay them real good money to vote wisely...and clearly they chose the wrong side....why put up with it? This is the best way to tell Corporate America.. that they will never high jack this Country into war again!
Akaka (D-HI)
Bingaman (D-NM)
Boxer (D-CA)
Byrd (D-WV)
Chafee (R-RI)
Conrad (D-ND)
Corzine (D-NJ)
Dayton (D-MN)
Durbin (D-IL)
Feingold (D-WI)
Graham (D-FL)
Inouye (D-HI)
Jeffords (I-VT)
Kennedy (D-MA)
Leahy (D-VT)
Levin (D-MI)
Mikulski (D-MD)
Murray (D-WA)
Reed (D-RI)
Sarbanes (D-MD)
Stabenow (D-MI)
Wellstone (D-MN)
Wyden (D-OR)
For information on your Congressman go to :http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=107&session=2&vote=00237
2006-09-07 04:02:22 · 10 answers · asked by dstr 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Gurrdy
Then how do you explain the NO votes?
No I can not accept this defense...nor should anyone!
2006-09-07 04:11:18 · update #1
Schmorgen
Yes sadly he is ..his vote is a Brave legacy..LIKE THE MAN HE WAS
2006-09-07 04:13:48 · update #2
jooker
This vote was in 2002...hello
2006-09-07 04:14:58 · update #3
rockandroll5...
As you can tell...I strongly diasagree with whatever reasons...the War (Invasion) was illegal under international law.
2006-09-07 04:17:19 · update #4
Rooby-Roo
And so what?...I am tired of PROFESSIONAL POLITICIANS
2006-09-07 04:18:36 · update #5
Mr Google
First this list is those who OPPOSED the war..secondly find out their position before you vote.
2006-09-07 04:21:03 · update #6
Zee HatMan
It is my contention That Bush was complicit in 9/11 along with the C.I.A.
2006-09-07 04:22:39 · update #7
Zee HatMan...This vote was in October 2002..can you say 'FACTS' Oh by the way dont ever call me or anyone else a inflamatory name for taking a political position you do not sharethen maybe you could have a serious debate.
2006-09-07 04:33:39 · update #8
Yes. Clean house!
Zee hat man- no new attacks is NOT an acomphisment.It is a lame excuse to skirt the issue.
2006-09-07 06:54:15 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hindsight is a wonderful luxury. Unfortunately the senators you mentioned were working on information they were assured by the White House to be true. You can't blame them if they were lied to. What counts now is what these senators do to correct the situation. if they do nothing then of course they should be fired. But if they are taking pro-active steps to fix the situation then they should be commended for their honesty in admitting they were wrong.
Plus who's to say that the senator's opponent in the election would have done anything differently had they been in the senator's shoes when the vote was being held?
2006-09-07 04:11:48 · answer #2 · answered by Cardinal Richelieu 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The best way to destroy the country and bring in Socialism is to destroy Capitalism. One way to do that is to lie about the president and 'his' motives. Iraq was a terrorist stronghold run by a terrorist financier. Whom, I would add, used WMD against the Kurds and against Iran. Iraq is quickly becoming a free nation. You know that's the kind that doesn't support terrorists!
Bush accomplishments:
1. No new attacks.
2. Thousands of dead terrorists (in Iraq)
3. Hundreds of dead terrorists leaders.
4. Al Quida leaders on the run
5. An economy that has rebounded from the Democratic ineptness and heavy taxes
6. Jobs for anybody who wants one
And your plan is ... what?
Destroy the economy?
Help the terrorists regain Iraq?
Oh and (you freeking moron) Wellstone died some time back!
Try to get your facts straight before wandering into traffic ranting and raving!
2006-09-07 04:15:36 · answer #3 · answered by Zee HatMan 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
If we got rid of everyone who voted for it it would leave a whole bunch of people in power who have never served in congress. They would have little idea of how to do things and would be brought up and trained by these far left lunatics. We'd be closer to destruction than we have been since the war between the states.
2006-09-07 04:11:32 · answer #4 · answered by El Pistolero Negra 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I have to agree with the tiger! We were ALL misled by the media and our president with false statements and "classified" information. George,we all know now it was becaues Saddam put a hit on your father. And remember:that stupid joker(Senior Bush) turned are butts around on our way to Baghdad in 1991!
2006-09-07 04:13:20 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Going to Iraq was NOT a mistake, The USA freed 50,000,000 people the Oppression that was present under hussein's dictatorship. These Senators whose names appear here should be fired and several of them should be brought up on charges of treason and aiding and abetting the enemy, namely the terrorists who want
to destroy the USA and Israel.and the European nations.
2006-09-07 04:10:51 · answer #6 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
yes, the incumbents in congress will be voted out. Except Debbie Stabenow...thanks for the info. Oh yeah, and my main man Carl Levin!
2006-09-07 04:05:30 · answer #7 · answered by hichefheidi 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Iraq(black lines)... has(black lines)...weapons(black lines)...of(black lines)...mass(black lines)... distruction...
yeah, anyone could make an informed decision based on that intel. Or maybe we should hold the conservatives to account for forcing this illegal war down our throats from the start with this kind of crap.
Isn't Wellstone dead?
2006-09-07 04:09:57 · answer #8 · answered by Schmorgen 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No. Because their votes were based on the information available at the time, which they were assured and led to believe was the truth.
2006-09-07 04:07:47 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Just so you know Wellstone has been dead for years. When exactly did he "stand up" for your cause?
2006-09-07 04:10:07 · answer #10 · answered by jooker 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋