Do you think that a 13 year old boy should be put on the Sex offender registry and remain on it even if he goes through residential treatment and then aftercare and it has been 10 years since anything has happend and now he is supporting his family in good standing and good faith? I think he was to young to be put on there and especially if he went through all that and hasn't had a problem since and is raising his family with great morals. Do you think they should let him off the registry? I think being that young, come on givehim a chance. We all went through exploration and experimenting at those young ages.. Tell me what you think
2006-09-07 02:27:14 · 6 answers · asked by littlehawk2001 1 in Family & Relationships ➔ Other - Family & Relationships
why is it fine when you are older to have sex with someone 3 years apart then and when they are younger and not even have intercourse but be put on the registry?
2006-09-07 02:40:15 · update #1
The person that is on the registry talks to the supposively "victim" and they do everythign together, he made ammends and they are best friends. Nothing sexual is going on...and they are best of friends now..so how can people look at him as a sexuall preditor at 13?
2006-09-07 02:49:42 · update #2
Tough question. Yes, I believe anyone can change and everyone deserves a second (or maybe a third) chance. But on the other hand, some people don't change. Currently, the sex offender registry is the only way of tracking convicted and/or potential sex offenders. Concerned citizens want to know where they are and many choose where they will buy homes or send their children to school based on these stats. There is no easy answer. Sometimes our past deeds live on in our futures. Maybe this list will help deter a would be offender from committing an offensive act... knowing that the trail may follow him/her for the rest of their life. I don't think you can classify a sex offense with childhood exploration and experimentation. One is harmless and the other is harmful. Sex offenders are considered as harmful. These unnatural acts seriously affect the victim's feelings about themselves and their perception of the world they they live in for the rest of their lives. In short, the punishment should fit the crime.
2006-09-07 02:45:07 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, he needs to remain on the list. Obviously he was put on it because he had a problem at one time. Look at it like this, if your children were abused by a sexual offender, wouldn't you want him/her on a list FOREVER so that others are aware??? You would want to know whether your neighbor was a sexual preditor be it 2 years ago or 20. Best of luck to you.
2006-09-07 02:37:25 · answer #2 · answered by redrum 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
He wasnt too young, he knew what sex was n its concequences. let him pay the price so that he may give an example to his children n friends. He's gonna be just fine. if they put him off the register, what about others? on this site i have realised that ppl as young as 12 are sexually active.
2006-09-07 02:33:55 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Thats right, what we do as children we learn from that make us better adults, you cant go through life without those experiences or else you wouldnt have a clue, it is unfair for him to still be on there, try speaking with the courts.
2006-09-07 02:37:35 · answer #4 · answered by ♡MaNda♡ 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that at 13 you know not to sexually harass other people or force yourself on them. It's not "experimenting" at 13, it's rape, molestation, or what have you because the other person said no, or was too young to communicate.
2006-09-07 02:31:01 · answer #5 · answered by janicajayne 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think of decide Millian is the fairest and perfect to visual exhibit unit, because of the fact she concentrates on the info of the case, no longer all the extraneous drama, and explains the regulation that determines why she policies as she does.
2016-09-30 10:33:16 · answer #6 · answered by wardwell 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋