Do u think that pres.Bush care about it...he says democracy and stuff...but actually its all about oil...he sayed that there is WMS...but there isnt...and even if they found it.... USA is not the world police...ok some ppl will say its will protect its securty...will NO its protecting Israel securty...2nd ok Iran will atack USA and they will clame they r protecting there country from the nutral power they have????the whole world will say its not logical...but why do they say about Bush talks r logiacal when if he sayed the same crap?????cuz the whole world is a slave to the goverment of the United States of America....or in other fraze it been brain washed by this "Muslim r Shity and Jewsh r the holy"...any jury will see my point now u should b the jury....
2006-09-07 02:23:30 · 14 answers · asked by International Nationalty 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Excuse my spelling
2006-09-07 02:28:07 · update #1
Come on i sayed execuse my spelling...i'm bad it not the best spelling ever...and answer the question never mind about the spelling
2006-09-07 03:30:10 · update #2
If it was about the oil, we would take over Iraq with 450,000 soldiers and rape the land dry. There would be no one that could stop us, save China and Russia, and I doubt that they would, for the economic boosts they receive from us.
Gas in the US would be under $2 again, and there would be no worries about cheaper methods of heating our homes, or fueling our cars. Oil would be it.
So, yes, terrorism is the main concern.
Now, I'm realistic, and I do believe that terrorism is not the ONLY concern. What good would it do to "save" everyone from terrorism, and help another country (at great expense), if there was nothing in it for us in the long run?
Fact is, it wouldn't. Yet, it wouldn't do us to have Iraq as an enemy either. We needed another "ally", as it were, in the middle-east region, and it had to be a country that had financial possibilities, as well as a strategic military location. It also had to be a country that would offer us the least resistance going in, which Iraq was, for many reasons.
It's MY belief that Iraq was "easy" (when compared to the loss of life sustained in most wars) because it's not what Hussein expected.
I could go on and on about this, but I wouldn't want to waste my time.
In some ways, yes, the rest of the world is a slave to the US. Why? Because they know if they openly oppose us, it will cost them. Not only will it cost them the status quo, but it will cost them our aid in times of trouble.
We do not believe that Muslims are evil. We believe that TERRORISTS are evil. They aren't real Muslims, any more than the "Christians" who bomb abortion clinics are actually Christians.
There's a lot you obviously don't know about the US. You would be best served to not judge unless you're American, and even many Americans aren't qualified to judge. THAT is because the majority of Americans are ignorant of the world, history, and our own government.
And you can't trust any news media completely, either. They all have their own agenda.
PS Next time, use spell check. That way, you won't have to worry about people criticizing your spelling and refusing to answer your question.
2006-09-07 02:38:37 · answer #1 · answered by The_Cricket: Thinking Pink! 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
it's not just bush- this kind of thing has been going on for decades. bush just made it blatantly clear to americans and the rest of the world how easy it is to be duped.
does the "american political agenda" (in place of bush) care about other countries? not if there is a resource involved.
look, a country may be eating live children and kicking puppies all day and we would look the other way if we were getting a kickdown of their resources.
sure, we give humanitarian aid to places sometimes, but that's because those in charge are usually pressured to.
most of these oil rich countries do fine by themselves. not to say that there is no torture in these places, but if we really wanted to make a difference somewhere, we should go to africa.
but we don't.
why?......
2006-09-07 02:40:13 · answer #2 · answered by scantron 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They DID find WMD's! And no, we're not pilfering your oil! I'm so SICK of that ignorant drivel from people who can't connect two dots and go to the lowest denominator of conspiracy theories. We didn't steal your oil in 1991 and we're not stealing it today! Oil is at an all-time record high in the US. We have certainly not had a massive influx of supply! In fact, it's in the US's best interest that Arab countries produce their own oil, because then we don't have to subsidize you as much! Economically self-sufficient countries are good for everyone and lead to greater regional stability!!
2006-09-07 02:29:40 · answer #3 · answered by lizardmama 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Oil=$ $=Power Terrorism has increased. More Americans dead in 'anti-terror' war than 9/11. It's all about the Big Buck.
2006-09-07 02:31:59 · answer #4 · answered by ishima 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
"You'll get everythin you want in life if you just help enough people get what they want"
Its a qoute i want to present to you. For me its perfectly fine that Bush is going for the oil as long as hes helping the Iraq to stand up on its own.
Jed B.
Webmaster
http://www.IdealWeightNaturally.com
2006-09-07 02:29:01 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Let's hope the jury has spell check
2006-09-07 02:27:00 · answer #6 · answered by mymadsky 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
he wants the oil to gain more cash. he is like a spoilt brat, but due to presidency if he doesn't have it he will just blow up a country till he does.
2006-09-07 02:33:19 · answer #7 · answered by shadownurse 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Chaney and him have alot to lose...money...if pull out of this war....so do you-like a President who kills American for his own personnel gain....God needs to Bless America
2006-09-07 02:29:05 · answer #8 · answered by babo1dm 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
FIRST TRY TO SPELL SO PEOPLE CAN READ YOUR QUESTION.IT IS QUITE CONFUSING. AND YES HE WANTS CONTROL OF THE OIL.
2006-09-07 02:28:31 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Of course he don't care,but I tell you one damn thing his *** has caused alot of damn **** that if it was'nt for him having other people to help him fight his damn battles his *** would be garss.I can't stand the SOB!
2006-09-07 02:30:19 · answer #10 · answered by dccuttie75 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋