2006-09-07 01:04:59 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
considering the "New World Order" (or novum ordum as it's written on the back of the US dollar), let's consider these three factors:
1- it is not "new" - it's simply a new face on the same old imperialism;
2- it is not "world" - it really is the imposition of Euramerican values on the globe. People on the "outside" are not involved in influencing decision making;
3- it is not "order" - there is an immense amount of disorder starting at the US-Mexican border and extending throughout the Middle East, Central and Eastern Europe, Central Asia, and so on.
It is a colourful label to cover for a terrible concept that reduces all values to material, monetary values and is based on establishing an empire.
So, I would say "bad."
2006-09-07 01:24:21 · answer #1 · answered by Sincere Questioner 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What new world order?
2006-09-07 01:12:15 · answer #2 · answered by P P 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It depends who's in charge. A global government has the potential to be a force for good, but it would have to be carefully cotrolled to prevent corruption- if the president of the world became corrupt, we'd all be screwed
2006-09-07 01:13:56 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you mean the by Bush Sr., he only said that once. He was refering to a corporate world. His son has pushed it further along. I don't like it as it is dehumanizing. However, as we old timers die off and young people grow more freedoms wil lost and not missed.
2006-09-07 01:16:30 · answer #4 · answered by doggiebike 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
50/50
2006-09-07 01:08:06 · answer #5 · answered by martin r 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it depend upon the person thinking
2006-09-07 01:11:29 · answer #6 · answered by ashish t 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
not sure yet, only time will tell.
2006-09-07 01:11:10 · answer #7 · answered by mythmagicdragon 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
just is
2006-09-07 01:07:19 · answer #8 · answered by george p 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
good.
2006-09-07 01:08:03 · answer #9 · answered by sweet sexy san 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋