The original concept of the Space Shuttle as a reusable system was to reduce the cost of space travel and reduce the time between missions. In its early stages, launches were viewed as being a weekly event with as little as three weeks between a Shuttle landing and being able to launch again.
There have been many spin off technologies from the Space Shuttle program. The ceramics used in the heat tiles have been used for industrial processes involving high heat. Much of the electronics miniaturization has come out the need to have things as small and light as possible to save on fuel at launch. It also creates jobs as the non-reusable parts need to be made every time a Shuttle launches. Upgrades also need to be done on the Shuttles every once in a while which also creates jobs.
2006-09-12 11:47:07
·
answer #1
·
answered by California Bear 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
sure. it's going to absolutely end the manned u.s. area software. nasa were construction the orion pill and aries rocket as a stick with as a lot because the vacation. although the obama administration canceled it. so now once the perfect vacation flies this 365 days the u.s. can do not have any thanks to launch human beings into area ever again. except by technique of shopping for rides on russian launches. there is been some lip provider about the u.s. determining to purchase rides to earth orbit from "deepest" businesses yet that's no longer some more thing desirable than a wishful pipe dream. no deepest employer has ever released a human into orbit on that's own and there is completely no market to help deepest launches. at $50 to $100 million in step with passenger on each and each and every rocket launch no human being except a billionaire ought to have sufficient money a cost tag into orbit. and there is no longer sufficient billionaires to keep a private launch employer in employer. (what number journeys to the iss can invoice gates or warren buffet make each and each and every 365 days?) as a count number of truth some aerospace contractors (lockheed and boing i imagine) fairly tried to commence a private launch consortium for satellites about ten years in the past. their consortium went bankrupt interior a pair years for lack of shoppers. and that's real that nasa ought to proceed doing unmanned area missions for the subsequent few years. yet that's absolute to end too before lengthy. unmanned exploration would not create an similar exhilaration as human area-flight and would not garner an similar public help. interior a pair years you'd be positive to hearken to washington funds cutters clamoring to end nasa's unmanned area software in basic terms as loudly as they ended the manned software in the present day. what you're seeing in the present day is the completed termination of u.s. area exploration any further.
2016-11-06 19:30:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
it shows they are a country that is a country of technology. I thinkits crazy how much we spend on the space program. the event that gets me is when NASA made a mistake that someone used the american standard of mesaurement instead of the SI system and a space probe crashed into Mars and costed us 125 million dollars. the only thing we recently have got from the space program is air mattresses.
2006-09-06 23:09:58
·
answer #3
·
answered by KrazyK784 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
Its a symbol of power 4 all to see.
2006-09-06 23:03:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by novembr 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
symbol of advanced methods of accomplishing both civil and military goals
2006-09-14 20:20:29
·
answer #5
·
answered by cesare214 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
As the Star Trek guy said, "To seek out new life and civilizations. To boldly go where no man has gone before!" *WHOOOOO PSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSHHHH!* DUN! Duh dah dun, duh dah DUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUN! Duh dah duh dah duh DAH DAH DAH, duh dah duh DUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUN!!!...
2006-09-06 23:09:00
·
answer #6
·
answered by Redeemer 5
·
0⤊
1⤋