Were the 'secret prisons' run by the CIA in foreign countries a good idea as a tool in the war on terror?

Question

I personally believe that if the slimy terrorists don't play fair, why should we? We need to use extreme measures when dealing with the Islamofacist terrorist or we can say goodbye to our country. (I know a lot of you socialists and NWO people would just love that).

Answer 1

War is war.

It is not a high school prom.

The purpose is to destroy the enemy,
not to wound them politely.


.

Answer 2

Indian forces are reliable sufficient and that i have no doubts on their features. they can handle every person. God prepared that day would not come that we'd might want to strive against a risky conflict like conflict with China. so some distance as China is in contact, China has no longer fought any conflict for more desirable than 5 many years, no one truly know their features. they have tried to expose their means in some practice parade, and we've considered. besides the undeniable fact that, it is largely what they practice, and exhibit isn't actual, that could be 10% of what all of us know, one hundred% of what all of us know or blown out of share. for this reason, i actually do no longer know how reliable is that united states. yet i assume that united states isn't a peace of cake. in spite of the reality that, if those 2 countries are at conflict, win or lose is out of question, because the conflict received't come to any end, before that international community will intervene and cease the conflict, yet their will be disaster and both the perimeters will be losers, the question is who will lose more desirable? optimistically none will use nuclear guns. shall we pray god for that.

Answer 3

Let's start with an analogy or hypothetical.

Someone knows there are two nuclear devices heading to the USA. This person and some others have been captured. The AG wants to prosecute them according to the law, of course he is going to have to wait since DC and NYC are going to levelled in less than a week. You have two choices; follow the politicians (socialists/liberals) or you can apply appropriate pressure to obtain the location of the two nuclear devices before they detonate.

Which way do you want to go?

People in America need to wake up and understand that the enemy is seeking to develop nuclear devices and when that happens those devices will be tested, but not on the ocean or in the desert, no sir, the first place they will be tested will be on live human beings.

You have a choice, you can vote for National Security in congress or you can vote for weakness, appeasement and surrender.

Answer 4

So much for the human rights campaign...well...I would rather support CIA "secret prisons" inside the US.....and have US stop blaming other countries for human rights violation when the do the same thing what the CIA is doing. Terrorists have to be handled differently than a criminal. He would have information which could save lot of lives...which he would not be ready to divulge...and certain types of prison are required to keep these terrorists.

Answer 5

Well, it depends on who you ask. You say the "slimy terrorists" don't play fair. Well, that's true.

But, holding people of Middle Eastern descent on SUSPICION of having committed heinous crimes against people, without having to come up with any proof that they even have the right people, is not fair at all.

I believe that only a percentage of the "detainees" at Gitmo even had anything to do with it at all.

As for the ones that were being held in the "Secret Prisons", without having first proven them guilty is not right. Just as it isn't right to hold US citizens in jail on charges alleged by an arresting cop, without having a timely hearing, giving the accused access to a lawyer,, etc....

What's wrong also, is, if you were being tortured horribly, don't you think that you might just say anything that you thought that might make them stop. Just say what you think they want to hear, whether it's true of not would probably be of little relevance, just so long as it would make them stop. I think that's pretty much a human reaction. So, torturing seems to be simply a cruel thing to do, that is more likely to get disinformation, than information that is accurate.

Answer 6

No, I don't think secret prisons are a good idea. If you think you are superior to "the slimy terrorists", you should act accordingly. You should have more trust in your country's resilience. Why not try to be a little less emotional and a bit more rational? Why do terrorists today behave the way they do and what do they have against the USA?

Answer 7

Hell Yes!!! Lock them up and don't let the AFL/CIO or the democrats know where they are. They'll just want them to have the liberties of American citizens. They are outlaws and we are at war with them. Lock 'em up, torture them, then tie them up naked in a public place for a week, then lock 'em up again. Or.... just kill the wacko.

Answer 8

Of course, American who are as primitive as those terrorist can't understand that many of them (or all) are innocent. Maybe to an aggressive, primitive country and people who are without moral (even thou they mention God all the time) is not obvious that they are the same as Nazi investigations or Muslim investigations in Sudan.

To the whole world is this action shameful and primitive.

Answer 9

I think if the US should be fair. It has repeatedly pressed other countries because it accused them of human rights violation. USA should not be allowed to run such secret prisons. Isn't USA the world police?

Answer 10

No. The secret prisons don't help anything or anyone except to make vindictive evil people feel good.

It has already been proven many times that torture doesn't help anything.