2006-09-06 21:45:25 · 16 answers · asked by Silkie1 4 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
Brilliant! ;-)
2006-09-08 09:23:34 · answer #1 · answered by Rich 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You may not get too many answers to this as it is such an awful play on words. The act of blinking proves one to be alive and therefore one is and it could be said that we exist through experiencing and that seeing is an experience - it would not be something somebody blind could subscribe to - such a person would confirm their existence through the other senses of touch, smell, taste and hearing
2006-09-06 21:53:22 · answer #2 · answered by big pup in a small bath 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You could be talking of your pet or something because all creatures-animals, birds and humans blink!
2006-09-06 22:11:27 · answer #3 · answered by anil m 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
am i therefore blink eye?
2006-09-06 21:50:22 · answer #4 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Very creative indeed, the original words is " I think therefore I am" from dante
2006-09-06 21:53:06 · answer #5 · answered by mbah marijan 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
very clever, does that mean if you hear then you are ear ??? the original was a misjudgement in my opinion, it is more accurate to say, I am, therefore I think !!!
2006-09-06 21:49:30 · answer #6 · answered by SUFI 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
eye-blink; therefore, im!
2006-09-06 21:48:19 · answer #7 · answered by altgrave 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
does the other eye agree with you, if not then modify:
I wink, therefore eye wonk!
2006-09-06 23:55:54 · answer #8 · answered by Shahid 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I read I read between the lines
2006-09-06 21:48:25 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Eye! - a small change of Hegel's concept :)
2006-09-07 00:50:33 · answer #10 · answered by genadestia 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Conscious of my bodily movements and actions
2006-09-07 01:36:58 · answer #11 · answered by Jim G 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋